AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Tiffany Martell

N3 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can , and limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderOverwhelming Busy WorkInflexibleUnclear InstructionsStressful Environment
  • Both reviews rate the professor very poorly and describe a stressful, unsupportive experience.
  • Students report tons of busy work, repetitive writing, and .
  • The course is difficult, test-heavy, and grading frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible, but comments say it requires , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course is already difficult and becomes , and unclear expectations.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Reviews describe the professor as inflexible, but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because the class feels stressful, unsupported, overloaded, and harshly graded.

Recommendation and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

, and unclear expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students describe lots of , and repetitive writing on top of a hard course.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews describe , and a stressful learning environment.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

and homework, so assessment appears split between exams and assignments.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, focusing on inflexibility, unclear expectations, heavy work, and .

Main concern

The main concern is a stressful course with heavy busy work and .

What students said

“I did not feel that I received the guidance or support needed to succeed.”
N-3
“she piles TONS of busy-work on top of an already difficult course.”
N-3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support a test-heavy and strictly graded course, but they do not clearly prove the .

Test HeavyDifficult CourseStrict Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a difficult course, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyDifficult CourseStrict Grading
“Test heavy”
N-3
“A .”
N-3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she piles TONS of busy-work on top of an already difficult course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“I did not feel that I received the guidance or support needed to succeed.”

⚖️

10/100

“A .”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“she piles TONS of busy-work on top of an already difficult course.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • The teaching had little flexibility or consideration for individual student needs or circumstances
  • I did not feel that I received the guidance or support needed to succeed.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • she piles TONS of busy-work on top of an already difficult course.
  • She requires lots of repetitive writing w/ little clinical relevance.

Theme 3

⚖️ and Clarity

  • A .
  • she is also unreasonable, inflexible & expects students to read her .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only two reviews, but both are recent, detailed, and highly consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

N-32 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values