AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Rochelle Rochelle McFee

ETHS010 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
35%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if , and a polarizing classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy readingGroup projectsPolarizing lecturesConfusing instructions
  • Students repeatedly , and .
  • Teaching reviews are sharply polarized, but negative comments dominate and often cite poor communication.
  • Getting a high grade is possible, but students say it often requires matching her expectations closely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

High grades appear possible, but students often , and needing to match her preferred framing to earn top marks.

, while in-person reviews show some A grades but still cite heavy reading and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course content is not always described as conceptually impossible, but the , and assignment expectations make it feel challenging.

Online students focus more on confusing setup, while and lecture delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but participation, in-class work, and group activities appear important.

Online evidence centers on group projects and engagement, while and class-based activities.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

because they report poor communication, strict grading, and a frustrating classroom tone despite some strong positive reviews.

Online reviews are more consistently negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Many reviews tag her as a and say good grades require following her expectations closely.

Format shift

Online reviews mention slow grading and needing to write what she wants, while .

Workload

Heavy

23/100

The workload is reading-heavy, with frequent comments about long readings, videos, group projects, and papers.

Format shift

Online reviews describe 6 or more hours weekly, while in-person reviews often cite 20 to 60 pages twice a week or lots of reading.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A minority praise her as , and knowledgeable, but many more describe unclear lectures, poor communication, and disrespectful interactions.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize communication problems, while and severe delivery complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and a final presentation rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes assignments and group projects, while midterm, and a final presentation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more mixed, but many still , and limited engagement.

Main concern

Students often describe lectures as or .

What students said

“Lots of reading required and not a lot of engaging class time”
5600
“Dr. and sets expectations well.”
5600
“Lots of reading! Between 20 and 60 pages twice a week and the .”
5858

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with complaints , and group projects.

Main concern

Students say online instructions and .

What students said

“ grade and the feedback is not good”
5473
“This class was more work than my calc 2 class this semester.”
5307
“Dr. McFee consistently was easy to reach and provided .”
5600

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but , and a group presentation final, while online exam policy is not clearly proven.

Blue-Book MidtermStudy Guide MentionedGroup Presentation FinalPop Quizzes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a group presentation final, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring or closed-book rules.

Blue-Book MidtermGroup Presentation FinalPop Quizzes Mentioned
“the ”
5858
“The know the definition, citation, and significance of 8 key terms.”
5600
“The a test so keep an eye out for that!”
5858

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or a .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was more work than my calc 2 class this semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ and would get angry if you asked them in class.”

📚 Workload

23/100

“Expect to do 6+hrs of .”

⚖️

24/100

“The only way you get a good grade is by saying exactly what she wants you to say.”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“I had a wonderful experience. A great lecturer. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very poor speaker. .
  • Dr. and sets expectations well.
  • She engaged with the students extensively, which allowed us to ask numerous questions.
  • She couldn't answer basic questions and would get angry if you'd even ask them.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a lot of reading, but she goes over it in class.
  • The only way you get a good grade is by saying exactly what she wants you to say.
  • She has offered many extra credits.
  • Lots of reading! Between 20 and 60 pages twice a week and the .

Theme 3

🧩

  • Prep for
  • .
  • but still enjoyable.
  • For

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 40 recent reviews across online and , though the tone is highly polarized.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 525

Course coverage

ETHS01015 reviews
560011 reviews
53077 reviews
54735 reviews
58582 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 8 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

15

B+ 6 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 2 · C- 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2