AI Rate Professor

English

Zu Vincent

ENGC1001 · ENGL2 · ENG119 · ENGL119 · ENGLISH2 · ENG11 · ENG2 · ENG1C · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
26.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if , but the single online review suggests that format may be much better.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear AssignmentsHidden GradesHeavy Writing WorkMandatory ParticipationHelpful Feedback When It Works
  • Recent in-person reviews , and mandatory in-class work.
  • The only online review is strongly positive, , and extra credit.
  • Older in-person reviews are split, with some students praising support and feedback while others call the class scattered and confusing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Getting an A is possible with effort and occasional , but hidden grades, vague expectations, and heavy writing make the true cost high.

Online evidence is easier and clearer, while track and effort does not always feel rewarded.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content can be manageable, but students often describe the class as , and sometimes harder than expected.

The online review frames the course as structured, while and unrelated history or politics content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and in-class participation appear important, with multiple in-person reviews warning that missing class hurts the grade.

In-person reviews strongly support mandatory attendance, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most recent in-person reviews advise choosing another professor because of , and unengaging classes.

The only online reviewer recommends the experience, but and much more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Some older reviews mention easy grading or , but many students report , and sharp grade drops.

Format shift

as straightforward, while as opaque or strict.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of homework, reading, annotations, papers, group work, and .

Format shift

Online work is described as building toward one major project, while as busy work or heavy writing.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

, but recent reviews heavily criticize unclear explanations, poor organization, and weak communication.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive, while in-person reviews range from and scattered instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears dominated by writing assignments, papers, annotations, projects, participation, and occasional quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to assignment-based grading, with online work leading to one major project and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly mixed but recent comments strongly emphasize , and heavy writing work.

Main concern

and organized assignment guidance may struggle.

What students said

“The professor lacks .”
ENGC1001
“you can't see your grades at all throughout the semester so keep up with everything!”
ENG11
“Her teaching style is so scattered and unorganized and I had to keep asking her for .”
ENG2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review describes a clear, manageable course with and .

Main concern

Only , so confidence is limited.

What students said

“The and the expectations were clearly communicated.”
ENGL2
“The opportunity for at the end of the semester was a thoughtful touch.”
ENGL2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, or .

Pop Quizzes MentionedMidterm MentionedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a midterm, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Pop Quizzes MentionedMidterm Mentioned
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENGC1001
“she gave me and 5 of my friends in the class an F on the mid-term”
ENGL119

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can find another one please do.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“The professor lacks .”

⚖️

30/100

“She also does not post your grades, so you have to check in with her to make sure you're passing all semester.”

👍 Format Difference

32/100

“The and the expectations were clearly communicated.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her teaching style is so scattered and unorganized and I had to keep asking her for .
  • .
  • and .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready for a class full of annotations and of time and resources.
  • ! SHE WILL ASSIGN A LOT OF IT TO PERFECT YOUR WRITING SKILLS.
  • Writing assignments are 60% of your grade so if you don't get 100%, your grade will drop tremendously, with little to no way of getting it back up.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • you can't see your grades at all throughout the semester so keep up with everything!
  • All her assignments are like 1 point or up to 5 points even the essays.
  • and held all the time so we were able to improve our grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 28 reviews span many years, include detailed comments, and show a consistent recent .

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 56
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENGL210 reviews
ENG26 reviews
ENGC10013 reviews
ENG112 reviews
ENG1192 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ENG1C2 reviews
ENGLISH22 reviews
ENGL1191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1