AI Rate Professor

English

Michael Griffin

ENGL002 · M4648 · ENGL2 · ENGL118 · ENGL · ENGLISH2 · ENG2 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him only if you , and delayed feedback for a manageable English grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but disorganizedBoring lecturesLots of reading and papersSlow gradingMixed grading fairness
  • Students often describe Griffin as kind and caring, but many say lectures are boring, scattered, or not useful.
  • The class can be passable with steady work, but , and .
  • Recommendation is highly mixed, with older positive reviews offset .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Getting an A seems possible with consistent reading, quizzes, and papers, but vague feedback and .

The only online review describes easy work, while passing and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content is not intellectually intense, but the , and unfocused lectures make the course feel harder than expected.

Online evidence makes the course sound easy, while , and reading-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance appears important because participation and in-class discussion matter, but reviews do not prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation and needing class presence, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students recommend him only conditionally because kindness and leniency are balanced , and .

The online review is highly recommending, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

38/100

Late work may be accepted, but as tough, vague, slow, or inconsistent.

Format shift

Online evidence suggests easy grading, while and delayed feedback.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

The , and multiple papers, with some students calling it manageable and others calling it heavy.

Format shift

The online review calls homework quick but heavy, while , and lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

He is often kind and caring, but many students .

Format shift

The online review praises engagement, while and include several recent complaints about weak teaching structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades , and participation rather than major exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize homework, reading, papers, or class work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with repeated praise for his kindness but frequent complaints about , and paper-heavy work.

Main concern

Students may not learn much and may wait a long time for grades or feedback.

What students said

“Good guy, but lectures were INSANELY boring.”
ENGL2
“He's scatterbrained and forgetful, prepare to constantly remind him of things.”
ENGL2
“Mr. Griffin was amazing.”
ENGL118

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single online review is strongly and an interesting class.

Main concern

Only one online review supports this view.

What students said

“Although he is a on how fast you read) and very easy.”
ENG2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and papers, but they do not clearly prove a .

Reading QuizzesPapersReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and papers, but do not clearly prove a standard exam policy.

Reading QuizzesPop QuizzesPapers
“ and small journal entries would be 70% of my grade”
ENGL2
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
ENGL002

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great guy, but . The class didn't teach much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Good guy, but lectures were INSANELY boring.”

📄 Workload and Grading

38/100

“RARELY gives full credit for papers even if .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

42/100

“Great guy, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were sort of asinine, he'd tend to stray off topic and get distracted.
  • I didn't really learn anything and his feedback on papers (60% of your grade) was .
  • . I learned so much.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • A lot of the work didn't feel connected or useful to English
  • Only good thing is that he is lenient with late work.
  • Your and papers put together cumulatively.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • , and caring.
  • He cares a lot and
  • Mr. Griffin was an extremely friendly teacher and he really cared whether you passed or not.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years provide detailed and consistent themes, though opinions vary strongly by time and format.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL26 reviews
ENG23 reviews
ENGL3 reviews
ENGL0022 reviews
ENGL1181 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISH21 review
M46481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1