AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Liam Luden

NURSING · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a demanding instructor and can handle strict expectations plus a highly uneven student experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingTough graderHigh standardsCaring for someFavoritism concerns
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who call him excellent and students who report favoritism or lack of support.
  • The course is not an easy A in experience even though many reported grades are A, because standards, quizzes, and exams are demanding.
  • , but both formats contain strong positive and negative claims.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Many students report A grades, but comments repeatedly describe , and heavy preparation.

, while online reviews are too split to soften that conclusion.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Nursing content is described as thorough, in depth, clinically demanding, and focused on critical thinking.

, while online reviews give limited and conflicting support.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews stress participation, clinical engagement, and weekly quizzes, but they do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews emphasize participation more strongly, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students who connect with , but many others report favoritism, poor support, or harsh treatment.

Both formats are polarized, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Multiple reviews call him a and .

Format shift

, while one online review also tags him as a .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews , and high expectations.

Format shift

, while online evidence mentions reading and tests but is limited.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Strong praise for thorough teaching is offset by repeated concerns about favoritism, emotional reactivity, and uneven support.

Format shift

In-person reviews are highly polarized, and online reviews split between excellent preparation and serious professionalism concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Students repeatedly mention quizzes, tests, exams, critical thinking, and clinical sign-offs as .

Format shift

, and clinical work, while online reviews mention proctorio but give limited assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews praise thorough lectures and real preparation but , and inconsistent support.

Main concern

Students who do not feel supported report exclusion, missed clinical learning, and harsh treatment.

What students said

“He is a and expects a lot out of you”
Nursing
“His lectures are thorough and applicable.”
Nursing

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are completely split, with one calling him one of the and one alleging favoritism, rudeness, and proctoring inconsistency.

Main concern

The small online sample contains serious conflict about professionalism and support.

What students said

“One of the prepared for my nursing job/careers.”
Nursing
“Unprofessional when helping other students cheat turning off proctorio for them.”
Nursing

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment looks strict because reviews mention weekly quizzes, demanding exams, and one online proctorio issue, with .

Weekly QuizzesCritical Thinking ExamsProctorio MentionedNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams that require critical thinking, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesCritical Thinking Exams
“He does give us weekly “quizzes” to make sure that ”
Nursing
“he makes sure that we are critically thinking when .”
Nursing

Online

Online reviews only clearly mention proctorio through one complaint, and they do not clearly prove the .

Proctorio Mentioned
“Unprofessional when helping other students cheat turning off proctorio for them.”
Nursing

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a and expects a lot out of you”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, , and support concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“His lectures are thorough and applicable.”

⚖️

24/100

“I had Liam during my second semester of nursing school- he is a , and doesn't take excuses lightly…”

🚩 Student Experience Split

48/100

“If he doesn't like you, then get ready to be excluded from everything.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are thorough, his standards are high and and meaningful.
  • He is passionate about what he teaches and really helps you understand the material.
  • His lectures were detailed and very helpful but repeatedly, they make you want to sleep.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a and expects a lot out of you
  • He does give us weekly “quizzes” to make sure that
  • He expects perfection and robotic efficiency from his students

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Fairness

  • He genuinely cares for every student.
  • Liam favors students he likes.
  • I share the sentiments expressed in reviews regarding his favoritism; if he does not take a liking to a student, the level of support provided is minimal.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews are recent and detailed, but credibility is moderated by unusually polarized claims and several null recommendation values.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

Nursing14 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 9

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values