AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Elizabeth Wannenmacher

CHEM2 · CHEM1 · CHEMADKH · CHEMI52 · CHEM12 · CHEM1LAB · CHEM52 · CHEM110 · CHEM110LAB · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
26.67%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can learn chemistry independently and mainly need a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMonotone LecturesSelf-Study NeededCaring Outside ClassTest HeavyMixed Grading
  • Students often describe her as kind and accessible, but many recent reviews say lectures are monotone and .
  • Grades are possible with steady effort, but , and studying make the A far from effortless.
  • In-person evidence dominates, while the single online review reports a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

43/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly tie , and self-teaching rather than easy points.

The lone online review says the A required hard struggle, while in-person and heavy studying.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Chemistry content is often made , and limited worked problem steps.

, while in-person evidence is mixed but often says lectures make the material harder to absorb.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say , and participation strongly affect success.

, while in-person reviews repeatedly stress showing up and not skipping.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is low because many students like her personally but .

The , and many in-person reviews also advise choosing another instructor despite some strong positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grading is inconsistent across reviews, but , and no make it feel stricter than lenient.

Format shift

The online review reports no and no dropped assignments, while grader.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, but , and heavy studying keep the workload from feeling easy.

Format shift

Online workload is described as lots of homework and printing, while but significant studying.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Her kindness and office help are real strengths, but frequent complaints about monotone lectures and self-teaching pull teaching quality down.

Format shift

Online teaching relied on prerecorded lectures, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly mention exams, tests, quizzes, and weight.

Format shift

The online review explicitly says two exams are 40% of the grade, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, with many praising her kindness but many criticizing slow, monotone lectures and .

Main concern

Many students say they had to teach themselves because lectures were dry or confusing.

What students said

“I learned nothing from the class since the only learning style is monotone lectures, and the .”
CHEM2
“Elizabeth is crystal clear! Just , and she tests and .”
CHEM52

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says the course , and was harder than expected despite quick email replies.

Main concern

The online student had to rely on Google and YouTube and struggled hard for an A.

What students said

“I struggled HARD for my A.”
CHEM1
“Google and .”
CHEM1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear important and sometimes hard, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Exam-Heavy GradingWeekly QuizzesPractice ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and lecture-based exams, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book policy.

Test HeavyWeekly QuizzesPractice ExamsLecture-Based Tests
“ as practice.”
CHEM2
“ and .”
CHEM52

Online

The online review says two exams are 40% of the grade, but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policy.

Two ExamsExam-Heavy GradingNo Extra CreditNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“2 Exams 40% of your grade.”
CHEM1
“No .”
CHEM1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Like her as a person, just do not agree with her teaching style.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Very monotonous lectures and class interaction in nonexistent, which makes for a very difficult learning environment.”

👍 Recommendation Level

34/100

“ 70-95 minutes and it's not very engaging- she speaks in a slow speed and very monotoned, so losing focus is a daily occurrence.”

📈 Effort For Grades

43/100

“I struggled HARD for my A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a horrible teacher. Lectures for anywhere between 1-1.5 HOURS. .
  • She's nice, but her teaching style is totally incomprehensible and, thus, boring.
  • Elizabeth is crystal clear! Just , and she tests and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The aren't good.
  • She is a ; it will be recognized.
  • Very by the book. .

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • and cares.
  • , and .
  • and but this class would've been better in person.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years with detailed, repeated themes, though online evidence is only one review.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 59
3 out of 59
2 out of 59
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CHEM125 reviews
CHEM28 reviews
CHEM525 reviews
CHEM123 reviews
CHEM1102 reviews
Show 6 more courses
CHEM110LAB2 reviews
521 review
CHEM 521 review
CHEM1LAB1 review
CHEMADKH1 review
CHEMI521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1