AI Rate Professor

English

Amy Antongiovanni

ENGLI119 · ENGL31 · ENGL6 · ENGL3249 · ENGLI14 · ENGL2 · ENG110 · ENG20 · ENG6 · ENG119 · ENG11 · ENG14 · ENG2 · ENGL20 · ENG · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
45.83%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if , and revision chances, but if you need tight organization or neutral class topics.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganized but caringHeavy reading and writingGood feedbackOpinionated discussionsExtra credit opportunities
  • Students often describe her as kind, helpful, and feedback-oriented.
  • Disorganization around due dates, modules, and .
  • The class is usually passable with effort, but workload and political or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn A grades through revisions, , and lenient moments, but the , and organization issues mean the A is not effortless.

, while online reviews describe heavier effort and worse support.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The English content is usually approachable and discussion-based, but and heavy writing make it feel harder for some students.

as easy or manageable, while online classes are harder mainly because of .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly mandatory, but participation and hearing due dates in class are important to staying on track.

In-person reviews emphasize participation and class attendance, while online reviews focus more on module access and due dates.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

and discussion, but many warn against her disorganization, workload, and opinionated topics.

In-person recommendations are mixed but often positive, while online reviews are mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

61/100

Grading ranges from lenient with and late flexibility to harsh for some essay students, so the overall pattern is mildly lenient but inconsistent.

Format shift

, and easy grading more often, while online reviews include tougher grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and discussion preparation.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, but online students describe it as harder to manage because of disorganization.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is often caring and engaging with , but recurring disorganization and polarizing classroom tone limit the teaching experience.

Format shift

, while online teaching is criticized for poor structure and limited accessibility.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment is driven mainly by , and occasional quizzes rather than frequent exams.

Format shift

and writing, while online reviews do not clearly describe a different assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but stronger, with many , and discussions while still noting disorganization and workload.

Main concern

and and writing.

What students said

“ and solid guidance on your work, and there are always opportunities to make revisions.”
ENG
“Be prepared for a lot of reading and writing though.”
ENG2
“However she is so .”
ENGL2

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, focusing on poor organization, , and heavy work.

Main concern

Online students report disorganization and limited support.

What students said

“ and inaccessible.”
ENGL31
“Her due dates and and assigned.”
ENGL20
“She also makes you work for the grade, that is for sure.”
ENG11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest exams are not the main assessment method, but the and not clearly proven across courses.

Few QuizzesFew TestsFinal PresentationUnclear Test Alignment

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe few tests or quizzes in some courses, a presentation final in one course, and .

Few QuizzesFew TestsFinal PresentationUnclear Test Alignment
“We only had a so if you're looking for something more challenging, I recommend not taking this class.”
ENG6
“You have 3 big essays, but want to do.”
ENG2
“She doesn't believe in tests so it puts a lot less and midterms.”
ENGLI14

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“LOVE Amy as a person, but . so it's often difficult to understand what she wants and when it's due and that was very stressful for me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ and solid guidance on your work, and there are always opportunities to make revisions.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“However she is so .”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“Be prepared for a lot of reading and writing though.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

56/100

“Take her for English! !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and kind.
  • and gives great lectures.
  • and concise in what she expects.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • Be prepared for a lot of reading and writing though.
  • She gives an insane amount of work, you will have to sort through it because some things are marked with due dates while others are not.
  • She grades easy though.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • She can be a , so it is important to write down due dates and assignments when they are discussed in class.
  • Her due dates and and assigned.
  • .

Theme 4

💬 About Class Fit

  • She tends to let her political views out in lectures and has a underlying motive to impose it at times.
  • Her classes were fun.
  • If you have differing opinions be sure to make strong arguments and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years and courses, with consistent themes around caring support, disorganization, workload, and mixed recommendation strength.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 514
3 out of 56
2 out of 59
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG217 reviews
ENGL26 reviews
ENG4 reviews
ENG114 reviews
ENGL314 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ENG143 reviews
ENG203 reviews
ENG62 reviews
ENG1101 review
ENG1191 review
ENGL201 review
ENGL32491 review
ENGL61 review
ENGLI1191 review
ENGLI141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 4 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1