AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Michelle August

NURSING · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and learn independently while keeping up with reading and homework.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganized course flowHeavy readingUnclear clinical prepResponsive email repliesTest expectations are clear
  • Students report serious disorganization and unclear instructions, especially for those without medical experience.
  • Both reviewers earned A grades, but and .
  • Exam content seems clearly communicated, but reviews do .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Both reviewers earned A grades, but , and unclear guidance make the A require steady effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course feels harder because and weak clinical preparation make the material difficult to navigate.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person Nursing reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One tag says participation matters, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews mention participation, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Students give low quality ratings because organization, clarity, and clinical preparation are major weaknesses.

The recommendation evidence is only from in-person reviews, and it is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Both reviewers received A grades and , but comments do not describe grading as generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention lots of homework and , so the workload is clearly not light.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students describe disorganization, unclear communication, book-reading lectures, and weak clinical preparation.

Format shift

All and is consistently weak.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention homework, reading, participation, clinical work, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe poor organization and weak clinical preparation, with and test clarity.

Main concern

Students may and clinical expectations on their own.

What students said

“Disorganized.”
Nursing
“Never misleads you on what will be on the test.”
Nursing

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly support that test content is communicated, while , and .

Test Content Clearly Communicated

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or final exam format.

Test Content Clearly Communicated
“Never misleads you on what will be on the test.”
Nursing

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're looking for inspiration, clarity and encouragement, you'll find the opposite with Michelle.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Get ready to read”

⚖️ Test Clarity

62/100

“Never misleads you on what will be on the test.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Disorganized.
  • .
  • She could do better during clinicals.

Theme 2

📊 About Workload and Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Get ready to read
  • Never misleads you on what will be on the test.

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • Gets back to you .
  • Tells you to keep in touch with her, but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, so the signal is limited even though the concerns are detailed and consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Nursing2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values