AI Rate Professor

English

Finn Kraemer

ENG11 · ENGL1001 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and little guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOverwhelming HomeworkHarsh GradingUnclear InstructionsUnapproachableFormat-Critical
  • Students consistently describe an extreme workload with .
  • as harsh, especially around MLA formatting and essay requirements.
  • Both online and and limited support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Even students who report high grades describe harsh formatting penalties, low grades for hard workers, and major effort for basic assignments.

Online and for grades, with online comments stressing formatting penalties and in-person comments stressing low grades despite effort.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The English content is made difficult , and a fast accumulation of large tasks.

, while in-person reviews add that missing class can directly hurt the grade.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

because one in-person review says missing one class can hurt the grade, and no review shows flexibility.

The , while online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

2/100

Students repeatedly warn against taking him because the , and unsupported.

Both online and recommendation evidence in either format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students repeatedly cite tough grading, major MLA penalties, , and low grades despite hard work.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize formatting and half-credit issues, while and low grades for regular effort.

Workload

Overwhelming

0/100

Students describe multiple large assignments every week, long tasks, many papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe four or more weekly assignments, and in-person reviews describe at least .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Comments consistently describe unclear explanations, limited feedback, poor communication, and an unapproachable classroom experience.

Format shift

Online students report poor email response and , while in-person students report unfriendliness and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus mostly on papers, typing tasks, peer reviews, homework, and .

Format shift

Both formats center on assignments, with details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews also report , and stressful class expectations.

Main concern

Students say missing class, heavy work, and .

What students said

“Missing one class can hurt your grade.”
engl1001
“Homework is insane, at least 4 assignments a week that are extremely unecessary and hard.”
engl1001
“Truly a very stressful and overwhelming class.”
engl1001

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe heavy assignment volume, confusing directions, strict formatting grades, and poor communication.

Main concern

Students say online work is excessive and .

What students said

“A lot of emailed a few times.”
engl1001
“At a .”
eng11
“Does not tell you what youve done wrong just says "wrong" and gives you half credit.”
eng11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, midterm format, or final format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Truly a very stressful and overwhelming class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“He does not do a good job at explaining the work.”

⚖️

5/100

“If you do not follow his MLA formating you will get an " .”

📚 Workload Pressure

0/100

“At a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor is not a very friendly person and can feel very unapproachable , making it hard to get clarification.
  • and explanations were limited, making the class frustrating.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Homework is insane, at least 4 assignments a week that are extremely unecessary and hard.
  • He requires too much work and and it takes so much time for each one!

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • points.
  • I have classmates who work very hard and turn in their work regularly, yet still get a low grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Nine recent reviews across both formats are highly consistent, detailed, and uniformly negative.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 59

Course coverage

engl10016 reviews
eng113 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1