AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Kathline Wright

PSY16 · PSY1 · PSYCH006 · PSYCH16 · PSY6 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want an engaging psychology class with , but expect long lectures and regular writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesCaring teacherWriting-heavy workClear criteriaMixed online communication
  • Students usually describe Wright as engaging, caring, and easy to learn from.
  • Grades are often very reachable, but and .
  • The class is usually assignment-heavy, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

83/100

An A is usually very reachable through regular writing and participation, though careless writing can be penalized online.

, while online reviews show easy grades but more complaints about grammar grading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The content is generally accessible and interesting, but long lectures and .

Online students mention long lectures and weekly writing, while and enjoyable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

online flexibility but clear in-person participation requirements in PSY16.

, while in-person PSY16 reviews explicitly say attendance is taken or required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her for engaging teaching and .

In-person recommendations are consistently strong, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades are often high and appears, but some online students report and slow feedback.

Format shift

In-person reviews lean more lenient, while online reviews include the .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is manageable but writing-heavy, with , and projects in several sections.

Format shift

Online work centers on weekly posts and reflections, while , and group projects.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students find her caring, passionate, and engaging, though some online reviews describe lectures as .

Format shift

, while online feedback is more mixed because of lecture length and communication issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews , and limited or no exams in several sections.

Format shift

Online reviews describe discussions and reflections with no tests in one section, while , and some at-home tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, engaging lectures, and a caring teaching style.

Main concern

Some in-person sections require attendance, participation, papers, or group projects.

What students said

“ !!! Super easy A”
PSY1
“She does require attendance and participation; if you miss an .”
PSY16
“ and group projects.”
PSY16

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between very positive learning experiences and complaints about disorganization, rudeness, and .

Main concern

Some online students struggled with , and .

What students said

“One discussion post + 2 comments and a 500 word reflection per week. .”
PSY6
“ and unclear. ”
PSYCH006
“Kathy has so many neat examples that .”
PSYCH006

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because several reviews describe no exams, no tests, or at-home tests, and reviews do not clearly prove strict proctoring.

No Tests Or QuizzesAt-Home Tests And QuizzesNo ExamsPapers And Projects

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence varies by course, with one review saying tests and quizzes were at home and another saying there were no exams.

At-Home Tests And QuizzesNo ExamsPapers And Group Projects
“Most of everything is online so tests and .”
PSY1
“ and group projects.”
PSY16

Online

Online evidence says , and reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring rules.

No Tests Or Quizzes
“ .”
PSY6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kathy has so many neat examples that .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She made the class so interesting and fun with many real-world examples”

📈 Easy Grade Path

83/100

“ !!! Super easy A”

⚖️

72/100

“She does require attendance and participation; if you miss an .”

📝 Workload Shape

62/100

“One discussion post + 2 comments and a 500 word reflection per week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures are long and detailed but they are great!
  • Kathy has so many neat examples that .
  • She is passionate about the topic and keeps it interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • !!! Super easy A
  • There is available though.
  • and lenient .

Theme 3

📝 About Work And Exams

  • and group projects.
  • .
  • a few 500 word papers and a !

Theme 4

⚠️ About Online Concerns

  • Takes FOREVER to grade.
  • It was hard to ask questions and when she did answer them she was rude.
  • and unclear.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed, mostly consistent evidence with a few important online outliers.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSY14 reviews
PSY164 reviews
PSY64 reviews
PSYCH0063 reviews
PSYCH161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 8

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1