AI Rate Professor

History

Heidi Anderson

HIST18 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can tolerate heavy online busywork, poor organization, and limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOverwhelming WorkloadHarsh GradingPoor OrganizationUnresponsiveTech Problems
  • Students consistently , and peer reviews for a 3-credit online GE course.
  • The course content itself is not always described as hard, but the , and organization make the experience punishing.
  • Reviews report , and technology problems that harmed grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Many students earned A-range grades, but they , and grade risk from unclear or faulty processes.

All evidence comes from Online reviews, with no In person reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The material is not described as intellectually difficult, but the class and .

All evidence comes from Online reviews, with no In person comparison available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly mention attendance requirements or meeting flexibility.

Online reviews discuss workload and ; there are no In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly discourage taking the class because of , and disorganization.

All recommendation evidence is from Online reviews, and it is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly call the and , and a severe final assignment grade issue.

Format shift

In person evidence.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Reviews consistently mention , and weekend peer reviews.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from Online reviews, with no In person evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe poor organization, weak communication, low technical skill, and .

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from Online reviews, with no In person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Comments focus on papers, homework, discussion posts, peer reviews, readings, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews show an ; there are no In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are consistently negative, emphasizing overwhelming workload, harsh grading, weak organization, and poor communication.

Main concern

The main concern is excessive tedious work combined with and low instructor support.

What students said

“Had to watch 5 hours of videos in 4 days with excessive amounts of .”
HIST-18
“ .”
HIST-18
“This professor assigns an insane amount of work for a 3 credit class.”
HIST-18

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , or Lockdown Browser use.

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenFinal Assignment Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention a and plagiarism-detection software, but they do not clearly prove the .

Final Assignment MentionedPlagiarism Software MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“the to detect plagiarism”
HIST-18

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor assigns an insane amount of work for a 3 credit class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Lacked organizational skills, due dates did not match in assignment instructions.”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“Had to watch 5 hours of videos in 4 days with excessive amounts of .”

⚖️

10/100

“Graded harshly with .”

👍 Recommendation Level

5/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lacked organizational skills, due dates did not match in assignment instructions.
  • Not tech savvy, poor turn around for grading.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Graded harshly with .
  • The work isn't difficult, but it is incredibly tedious.
  • My grade dropped to a B.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Had to watch 5 hours of videos in 4 days with excessive amounts of .
  • she assigns a lots of though
  • Discussion posts end up looking like essays and the weekend.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent online reviews are detailed and , and communication problems.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HIST-186 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values