AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Heidi Anderson

HIST8 · HIST10 · HIST008 · HIST5 · N4756 · HIST010 · HUM022 · HIST17B · HUM70 · HUM17 · HIS10ONLINE · HIST08 · HUM22 · 80 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
38.71%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can handle heavy independent work, strict deadlines, and detailed formatting rules.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy reading loadStrict gradingUnclear instructionsFirm deadlinesPolarized experience
  • Many students report , and early deadlines.
  • Grades can be high, but students often describe strict formatting, citation rules, and .
  • Older reviews include strong praise, but recent online reviews are much more negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible and common, but students repeatedly , and careful formatting.

Online reviews more often warn that the A comes with strict workload, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The history content is not described as conceptually extreme, but and .

Online reviews emphasize confusion and workload, while as manageable if you keep up.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Many online reviews describe , but strict early deadlines reduce flexibility.

Online evidence centers on due dates, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students recommend her when they value learning and feedback, but many warn against her because of , and .

Online recommendations are much more negative in recent reviews, while and often older.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students frequently describe tough grading, strict formatting, denied work, and citation rules despite many reported A grades.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest strict-grading evidence, while and .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

The dominant pattern is , and weekly assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly call the workload heavy, and though with slightly more positive framing.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with praise for passion and feedback offset by repeated complaints about organization, clarity, and communication.

Format shift

Recent online reviews are much harsher, while as engaging and helpful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mostly describe , and unit work rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to assignment-based assessment, especially online sections.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person evidence is mixed, with some students praising her passion and feedback while others still report heavy work and .

Main concern

The main concern is workload and assignment clarity rather than the core course content.

What students said

“ and an extremely easy A.”
HIST17B
“Easy A if you put in the time.”
HIST010
“She grades fairly but the workload is crazy.”
HIST010

Remote format

Online

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly polarized but recent students often , and early deadlines.

Main concern

The main risk is a heavy online workload with strict rules and .

What students said

“This teacher has been the .”
HIST5
“The class is extremely rigorous.”
HUM22
“If you do all the , and follow directions this class is an easy A.”
HIST010

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews repeatedly mention no tests or quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, .

No TestsNo QuizzesAssignment-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in some comments, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, midterm, or final policies.

No TestsNo QuizzesAssignment-Based Assessment
“ .”
HUM22
“3 papers that she practically wrote for .”
HUM22

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention no tests or quizzes in several sections, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

No TestsNo QuizzesAssignment-Based Assessment
“ ”
HIST010
“No textbook was required we used online stuff.”
HIST08
“ and write a .”
HIST08

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, determining the expectations was the hardest part of this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and deadlines. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Lacked organization skills, due dates didn't match instructions and requirements were vague.”

⚖️

28/100

“This teacher has been the .”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“Some assignments took me 20+ hours to complete.”

👍 Recommendation Level

42/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Anderson was amazing!
  • She made history easy to learn!
  • Lacked organization skills, due dates didn't match instructions and requirements were vague.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A if you put in the time.
  • and an extremely easy A.
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • The online course is a very heavy load.
  • I spent 10-20 hours a week on work for this class alone!
  • Had to watch 5 hours of videos and read excessively in 4 days.

Theme 4

⏰ About Deadlines and Rules

  • No late work accepted AT ALL with no exceptions
  • all the due dates are 8am Sat/Sun
  • firm deadlines no late work accepted

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

80

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, include detailed comments, and show consistent workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 57
3 out of 59
2 out of 515
1 out of 526

Course coverage

HIST01012 reviews
HUM229 reviews
HIST105 reviews
HIS10ONLINE4 reviews
HIST084 reviews
Show 8 more courses
HUM0224 reviews
HIST17B3 reviews
HIST83 reviews
HIST52 reviews
HIST0081 review
HUM171 review
HUM701 review
N47561 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 7 · A 15

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3