AI Rate Professor

English

Kelly Fredericks

ENG02 · ENGLI119 · ENG4 · ENGLIO2 · ENGL2 · ENG1192 · ENGL4 · ENGLISH4 · ENGL119 · ENGLISH2 · ENG2 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
69.23%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if and , and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and HelpfulStrong FeedbackWriting IntensiveTough GradingGroup Discussion
  • Most students praise her as , and .
  • The class is usually writing and reading heavy, so the A is possible but not effortless.
  • Some students report , and a need to attend and keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is very possible, but students , and using her feedback.

Online evidence shows doable work with some heavy weeks, while and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The material is usually accessible English and writing content, but the , and .

Online comments focus on workload and group projects, while , and class participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and class participation matter, though she can be personally understanding in special cases.

; online reviews do not clearly describe attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring, helpful, and and .

Online reviews are more mixed because of communication and Canvas concerns, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

some call her fair or flexible with revisions, while .

Format shift

Online students describe grading as not difficult, while and .

Workload

Moderate

43/100

The course often includes steady reading, essays, group work, weekly writing, or major projects, but most students do not call it unbearable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention group projects and twice-weekly deadlines, while , and writing workshops.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students most often describe her as , and invested in their writing growth.

Format shift

Both formats praise her support, but online and Canvas organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and projects, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing caring teaching, useful feedback, and .

Main concern

The main risk is that , and .

What students said

“ and listened to everyone's opinions about different topics.”
ENG2
“ if you want an easy A, she grades really hard.”
ENG02
“You will work for your grade. .”
ENG2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

two students found her caring and responsive, while one found communication and .

Main concern

Online students mention confusing Canvas or and steady deadlines.

What students said

“ . Lots of homework and group projects.”
ENGL4
“She can have some work heavy weeks but the .”
ENG02
“ .”
ENGL2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, but .

Essay-Based AssessmentNo Midterm Mentioned In One ReviewEasy Tests Mentioned In One Review

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention essays more than exams, with one review and another saying tests were easy.

No Midterm Mentioned In One ReviewEasy Tests Mentioned In One ReviewMajor Essays
“No text book, or .”
118
“The ”
ENGLISH4
“3 major essays are assigned”
ENG02

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will work for your grade. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and listened to everyone's opinions about different topics.”

📈 Effort For Grade

58/100

“You will work for your grade. .”

⚖️

48/100

“ if you want an easy A, she grades really hard.”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will help you every step of the way!
  • She gives great feedback on your papers allowing the opportunity for you to learn from your mistakes and implement your newfound knowledge.
  • Very cool and easy to understand.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework and group projects.
  • There are , as well as a novel, HW & classwork to do.
  • Lots of weekly writing.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • She is a and she expects you to be in class everyday.
  • as one can leave the class 1/2 way through the semester after completing C-level work.
  • She didn't focus on spelling as much as the content of the writing.

Theme 4

❤️ About Support

  • She checked-in with every student individually in the middle of the semester to ensure they were feeling good about the course.
  • and .
  • She tries hard to meet with any students who want help and is flexible with her office hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 36 reviews across many years with , and support.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG029 reviews
ENG27 reviews
ENGL25 reviews
ENGL1193 reviews
ENGLISH23 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGL42 reviews
ENGLI1192 reviews
1181 review
ENG11921 review
ENG41 review
ENGLIO21 review
ENGLISH41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values