AI Rate Professor

Languages

Lisa Williams

ASL001 · SIGNI · ASL002 · ASL1C4428 · ASL1 · ASL4428 · SIGN1 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
35.29%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you can learn independently, keep strict deadlines, and handle limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderPoor communicationHeavy homeworkStrict attendanceFast-paced signing
  • Students , and limited help when they ask questions.
  • Getting an A is possible, but it often requires steady homework, attendance, repeated video practice, and tolerance for .
  • Online reviews are much more negative than in-person reviews, especially around self-teaching and hard deadlines.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students describe tough grading, hard deadlines, lots of homework, and repeated video practice.

Online evidence is harsher because students report and little flexibility, while in-person students still say effort and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The ASL content is not always described as conceptually hard, but fast pacing, vocabulary load, and unclear signing make it harder for beginners.

Online students report more confusion from videos and , while and immersion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly treated as required for passing or keeping up.

, though one in-person review says she accommodated busy schedules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most negative reviews warn against taking her because of , and frustrating support.

Online reviews are strongly avoidant, while and appreciation for immersion.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students frequently call her a and report zeros, technical grading, and .

Format shift

and hard deadlines, while in-person complaints include hidden grades and strict expectations.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and steady preparation outside class.

Format shift

Online students describe heavy self-study and deadlines, while and study sessions.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students find her experienced and helpful, but , and weak support.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated worse because students felt abandoned, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention homework, workbook practice, participation, quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize video-based exams and timed tests, while , and occasional tests or quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students appreciating immersion while others call her rude, fast-paced, and homework-heavy.

Main concern

Students struggle with strict expectations, rude interactions, and fast signing pace.

What students said

“ASSIGNS SO AND WORKS US TOO FAST.”
ASL001
“There is no talking after the first day of class and she's strict about it.”
ASL1
“it feels as though you are being mocked when you don't understand something.”
SIGN1

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often felt unsupported, self-taught, and and hard deadlines.

Main concern

Poor communication and .

What students said

“ .”
ASL1
“Felt like I was teaching myself.”
ASL001
“No flexibility.”
ASL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support a strict exam environment with , and tests after fast-paced instruction, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Video Recording ExamsTimed TestsTests After Fast UnitsPop Quizzes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Tests After Fast UnitsPop Quizzes Mentioned
“TRIED TO TEACH US A UNIT IN 2 CLASSES AND THEN GAVE US A .”
ASL001

Online

Online and timed tests, but do not clearly prove webcam proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Video Recording ExamsTimed Tests
“The ”
ASL001
“ , so keep on top of .”
ASL002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and stay away from this teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Felt like I was teaching myself.”

⚖️

22/100

“ and she can be a .”

👍 Recommendation Level

34/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't communicate with her students
  • she barely explains what she's signing
  • she was not too demanding online.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • my signing had to be perfect
  • Do the
  • Gave me 0's without any explanation or makeups.

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Format

  • There is no talking after the first day of class and she's strict about it.
  • , so keep on top of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across many years give detailed and mostly consistent evidence, though the tone varies by course format.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ASL0017 reviews
ASL14 reviews
ASL0023 reviews
SIGN12 reviews
ASL1C44281 review
Show 2 more courses
ASL44281 review
SIGNI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1