AI Rate Professor

Communication

Katharina Teixeira

COMM1000 · CMST002 · CMST004 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a , but be cautious online and keep track of expectations from class.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportive public speaking coachGives useful feedbackEasy quizzesMostly clear expectationsNo late work
  • , and ability to make public speaking less stressful.
  • Grades are very reachable because , and one student earned an A after skipping the midterm.
  • The , and a much weaker online experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very attainable with , and generous timing, but no late work and occasional tough grading keep it from being effortless.

The Easy A evidence is almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the single and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Public speaking itself feels hard for many students, but and .

comfortable, while the online review says students had to figure things out alone.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory, but missing class can hurt because key expectations may be explained in person instead of on Canvas.

The attendance concern comes from in-person evidence about class explanations, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring, encouraging, and helpful, but the online review and .

In-person reviews are strongly recommendatory, while the lone online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Grades look forgiving because several students earned A or A+ grades and , though and no late work.

Format shift

, while the online review tags her as a .

Workload

Moderate

67/100

The workload appears manageable with easy quizzes and long deadlines, but , and .

Format shift

In-person reviews describe manageable work, while the online review gives too .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

In-person students repeatedly describe her as , and effective at building public speaking confidence.

Format shift

Teaching quality is excellent in person but weak online, where the review says lectures mostly repeated the book.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Assessment seems to combine speeches, projects, quizzes, and at least a .

Format shift

, and a midterm, while online assessment details are sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly , and making public speaking comfortable.

Main concern

Students should attend and track in-class grading details because .

What students said

“Kat made public speaking fun and comfortable.”
COMM1000
“The quizzes were all easy (straight out of the ”
CMST004
“Kate was very flexible and provided easy ways of gaining .”
CMST002

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative, saying lectures repeated the book and students had to infer expectations.

Main concern

Online guidance and .

What students said

“You are expected to figure out what she wants yourself.”
CMST002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly support easy book-based quizzes and one skipped midterm, but they do not .

Easy Book-Based QuizzesMidterm MentionedExam Policy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mention a midterm, but do not clearly prove final exam or proctoring rules.

Easy Book-Based QuizzesMidterm Mentioned
“The book)”
CMST004
“I skipped the midterm and still finished with an A.”
CMST002

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kat made public speaking fun and comfortable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

84/100

“If you have the !”

📈 Grade Value

84/100

“I skipped the midterm and still finished with an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Kat made public speaking fun and comfortable.
  • Makes the environment a great space in a hard class like public speaking.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The book)
  • Kate was very flexible and provided easy ways of gaining .
  • and does not accept late work

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity And Format

  • I am consistently annoyed with the lack of direction in .
  • You are expected to figure out what she wants yourself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years give useful patterns, but only one online review limits confidence for format comparisons.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CMST0024 reviews
CMST0042 reviews
COMM10002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values