AI Rate Professor

Communication

Laura Rapozo-Davis

CMST4 · CMST2 · CMST10 · CMST010 · CMST02 · N5182 · CMST13 · CMST14 · 72 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
91.67%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take her if you want a and a very realistic path to a strong grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveClear gradingExtra credit friendlyEngaging lecturesGroup project heavy
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Laura Rapozo-Davis as , and engaging.
  • Grades are usually very reachable because and is common.
  • The main drawback is group work and occasional time-consuming assignments, especially in CMST4.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very reachable with completed work, participation, and , though some sections still require steady effort.

Online evidence is stronger for and clear rubrics, while but more group-project dependence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Most students call the material easy, interesting, and beginner-friendly, with speeches or group work as the main challenge.

Online classes can have more tracking and reading, while as easy but presentation-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

Attendance is often useful or expected for participation and in-class work, but comments do not show a .

Online reviews mention mandatory Zoom only rarely, while and missed in-class work can matter.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students repeatedly recommend her because , and fair with grades.

Both formats are highly recommended, with online students praising organization and in-person students praising classroom energy.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students repeatedly , and fair or easy presentation grading.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize and rubrics, while and presentation leniency.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

The workload is usually manageable, but , and due dates can become time-consuming.

Format shift

Online sections have more due-date tracking and discussion work, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and able to make communication classes enjoyable.

Format shift

Online reviews praise her organization and responsiveness, while and ability to reduce speaking anxiety.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Assessment appears balanced across , and discussion work.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions quizzes, exams, papers, and discussions, while , and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

speaking, easy tests, and supportive classroom environment.

Main concern

Group projects and participation can affect the experience, especially if teammates are weak.

What students said

“I hate presentations and talking in front of everyone but she just makes it seem so easy and fun.”
CMST4
“This is an easy A but you have to work for it.”
CMST4
“This IS a class where ur GROUP determines ur grade, so b smart.”
CMST4

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews emphasize strong organization, quick communication, clear rubrics, and frequent .

Main concern

Some online sections include lots of .

What students said

“ , and has clear rubrics for every assignment and speech.”
CMST02
“Easy class, if you just do your work you will get an A!”
CMST14
“Lots of work, but getting an "A" is all up to you cause it is definitely possible.”
CMST13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is generally low because students describe easy tests and , but online proctoring is not clearly proven.

Open Book TestsEasy TestsQuizzes And ExamsFew Tests In Some Sections

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support easy or .

Open Book TestsEasy TestsLittle To No Tests
“The and open book!”
CMST4
“We had 3 debates/speeches, 3 tests, and .”
CMST14
“there .”
CMST14

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, and exams, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Online QuizzesOnline TestsThree Exams Mentioned
“Get the book digitally and .”
CMST10
“The as well as the big assignments”
CMST13
“Finally, there are 3 exams & 2 papers.”
CMST13

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“One of the !”

👍 Recommendation Level

95/100

“ .”

⚖️

88/100

“ , and is always there if you need extra help.”

📚 Workload Balance

63/100

“This is an easy A but you have to work for it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the class very interesting.
  • Lectures were fun and interesting.
  • She is very passionate about what she teaches and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Easy class, if you just do your work you will get an A!
  • Lots of , and fun to be around!
  • You will need to do your work to earn your grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Character

  • Genuinely cares about students and their wellbeing, is always so positive and fun to be around.
  • Laura is so supportive and really cares about her student's success!
  • She's helpful and supportive, relatable and approachable.

Theme 4

👥 About Group Work

  • You have to work in groups for many projects.
  • This class is WHOLLY based on group work ONLY.
  • , but you have the option to pick your partner.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

72

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, both formats are represented, and the comments are detailed and highly consistent.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 563
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CMST414 reviews
CMST1312 reviews
CMST1412 reviews
CMST106 reviews
CMST0102 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CMST022 reviews
CMST21 review
N51821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 8 · A 14

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2