AI Rate Professor

Criminology

Richard Seghieri

AJ008 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
35.71%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if , and learning heavily from the textbook.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHeavy WorkloadClear RubricsLow FlexibilityPolarizing Teaching
  • Students consistently , and little tolerance for weak or late work.
  • A minority of students praise the , and field knowledge when they put in serious effort.
  • Online reviews are polarized, while the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments repeatedly say the A requires serious effort, strict adherence to rubrics, and no late mistakes.

Online evidence shows possible high grades with hard work, while and grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material is not described as impossible, but , and high expectations make the course feel demanding.

Online difficulty comes from workload and self-teaching, while in-person difficulty is .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Attendance rules are not clearly established, but comments show low flexibility around deadlines and .

Online reviews mainly mention strict late-work rules, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Most students warn against taking the class because of , and inflexibility.

Online reviews include a few strong recommendations, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call him a , and gives little room for mistakes.

Format shift

Both formats report tough grading, with .

Workload

Overwhelming

20/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and weekly tests.

Format shift

Online workload complaints focus on reading, assignments, and McGraw Hill, while in-person comments mention .

Teaching experience

Poor

41/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with some students praising clear rubrics and passion while many describe poor support and weak interaction.

Format shift

Online reviews are mixed, but as poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

64/100

Assessment , and exams rather than relying on only one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention two exams plus coursework, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person evidence is limited but strongly , and poor flexibility.

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“Super tough, rude to students, and not flexible at all.”
AJ008
“assigns nothing but .”
AJ008

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are sharply split and students who feel unsupported, overworked, and harshly graded.

Main concern

, and limited instructor interaction are the main risks.

What students said

“Way too much work. Barely answers questions, basically a heartless robot professor.”
AJ008
“The .”
AJ008
“He is a , and .”
AJ008

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by format, with online reviews mentioning a midterm and final from the textbook and .

Online Midterm And FinalTextbook-Based ExamsIn-Person Weekly Mandatory Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, webcam use, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser.

Weekly Mandatory TestsHour-Long Tests
“assigns nothing but .”
AJ008

Online

and final, with material straight from the textbook, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Midterm And FinalTextbook-Based Exams
“Mr. and final) and the material is straight from the textbook.”
AJ008

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't take this class no matter what. and doesn't provide any feedback on why you are getting partial credit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

41/100

“The .”

⚖️

18/100

“ and doesn't provide any feedback on why you are getting partial credit.”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“Far too much work, and unrealistic expectations.”

👍 Recommendation Level

36/100

“ . Awful. Awful. Awful!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great instructor. Thorough, but not tough!
  • There is no interaction with the instructor.
  • The instructor is incredibly passionate and cares about students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • He is a , and .
  • If you turn in an for it.
  • Even if you answer the questions he asks he will grade poorly.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Format

  • Way too much work.
  • The course heavily relies on McGraw Hill, and there is no interaction with the instructor.
  • and it's easy to form a routine to stay on top of what is due.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 recent reviews provide detailed, and heavy workload despite polarized opinions on teaching.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

AJ00814 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2