AI Rate Professor

Reading

Nicole Lagrave

READ2 · ENG118 · EDUC2 · EDEU302 · C3951 · READING2 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you want a supportive teacher and can handle steady work, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but demandingHeavy homeworkStrict gradingHelpful feedbackEngaging teacher
  • Students often praise her kindness, humor, and care for student success.
  • Workload and grading vary sharply by course, with recent ENG118 reviews describing strict grading and repeated revisions.
  • Students who attend, ask for help, and keep up with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic when students attend and complete the work, but and repeated revisions.

Online evidence is mixed between strict ENG118 and forgiving EDUC2, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material is not usually described as intellectually hard, but the workload and critiques make the class feel demanding.

Online EDUC2 sounds easygoing, while online and in-person ENG118 reviews describe a heavier and stricter experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

that skipping class can lead to failing.

, while online reviews focus more on late work and class length.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and feedback, but several warn against her because of grading and workload.

Online reviews conflict strongly, and but contain repeated workload warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Recent ENG118 , and assignments needing many revisions.

Format shift

Online and in-person ENG118 both show strict grading, while EDUC2 reviews describe more forgiving policies.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many students mention lots of , and long class sessions.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears mostly in ENG118 and older reading reviews, while EDUC2 online is described as easier going.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most , and helpful, despite recent complaints about strictness.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is split, while and support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and final assignments far more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly mention assignments and projects rather than tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a caring and inspiring professor, but many students , and .

Main concern

The expectations for assignments and attendance.

What students said

“So much in class paper and and late work.”
ENG118
“As long as you go to class and do the and taking notes) you will get an A!”
EDEU302

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online evidence is split between one very negative ENG118 review and one positive EDUC2 review with late-work flexibility.

Main concern

Online expectations can feel strict in ENG118 despite a more forgiving EDUC2 experience.

What students said

“It doesn't matter how many times you complete an .”
ENG118
“She allows a grace week to turn in work and accepts late work.”
EDUC2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and .

Exam Policy UnclearFinal Portfolio MentionedFinal Assignments Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework, but do not clearly prove exam rules, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book status.

Final Assignments MentionedExam Policy Unclear
“ accept them or give any credit”
ENG118

Online

Online reviews mention an but do not clearly prove exam rules, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book status.

Final Portfolio MentionedExam Policy Unclear
“The class is relatively easy going with an .”
EDUC2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you go to class and do the and taking notes) you will get an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“ , and wants to make sure you understand what you are doing.”

⚖️

32/100

“Nothing was ever good enough!”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“busy busy busy... tons of , but ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Nicole !
  • Nicole LaGrave is an amazing teacher, she's funny and very easy to talk to.
  • . The and engaging.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Doesn't grade on a fair scale and accept them or give any credit
  • As long as you go to class and do the and taking notes) you will get an A!
  • So much in class paper and and late work.

Theme 3

🧭

  • If you do not go YOU WILL NOT PASS.
  • She gives a decent amount of assignments but and gives you ample time + good late policy.
  • If you want a class to just attend, do work, and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across many years give rich detail, though course differences and older reviews reduce certainty.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1185 reviews
EDUC22 reviews
READING22 reviews
1181 review
C39511 review
Show 2 more courses
EDEU3021 review
READ21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1