AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Thea Wilson

CHEM110 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you are already comfortable teaching yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTough graderFast pacedHeavy homeworkAccessible but risky
  • Most in-person students describe confusing, fast lectures that require major self-teaching.
  • Grading is repeatedly described as tough, with difficult tests, quizzes, and .
  • One online review is positive, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

A good grade appears possible only with , and tolerance for .

The single online review sounds manageable, while and difficult assessments.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content is introductory, but rushed lectures and .

Online evidence says reading before class helps, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Attendance and participation seem important because lectures, labs, and quizzes can affect performance, but .

In-person reviews mention participation and skipping risks, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and the class often requires self-teaching.

Online evidence is positive but only one review, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and , and homework on untaught material.

Format shift

; the online review does not discuss grading strictness.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews mention lots of , and needing to learn material outside class.

Format shift

In-person workload is consistently heavy, while the as expected but manageable.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Several students say she is nice and accessible, but , and ineffective lectures.

Format shift

The online review praises responsiveness, while and pacing.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments emphasize tests, weekly quizzes, lab penalties, and and .

Format shift

and quizzes clearly, while online assessment evidence is not detailed.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and heavy independent work.

Main concern

Students often feel forced to learn chemistry from the textbook because lectures do not clarify the material.

What students said

“I felt like I was teaching myself chemistry at home through the textbook & ended up withdrawing.”
CHEM110
“She ZOOMS past all of the content and we don't get a because she's already on to the next thing.”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is positive and says she listens, answers questions, and expects students to read before class.

Main concern

The evidence is thin and still depends on reading before class to follow lectures.

What students said

“The class is simple, read the book before class so you can understand what the lectures are about.”
CHEM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly describe difficult tests and weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Difficult TestsWeekly QuizzesQuiz Material Not CoveredExam Policy Partly Unclear

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly quizzes, sometimes on material not fully covered in class.

Difficult TestsWeekly QuizzesQuiz Material Not Covered
“ .”
CHEM110
“there were weekly quizzes often on material not gone over in class.”
CHEM110

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam rules, quiz format, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book status.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I felt like I was teaching myself chemistry at home through the textbook & ended up withdrawing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ , and there were weekly quizzes often on material not gone over in class.”

⚖️

18/100

“Nice teacher definitely, wants students to succeed, very accessible outside of class. But .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't help you understand just repeats herself as if it'd stick more.
  • Often times only one example is given, the lectures are structured to be a highlight reel of what you learned at home.
  • She speeds through it as if the fact that she understands means we understand what shes teaching us.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She assigned us homework on things she never taught us that took up about 3/4 of our hw.
  • there were weekly quizzes often on material not gone over in class.

Theme 3

🧭 About Support

  • I like how Thea is always ready to listen to her students concerns.
  • If you have any questions she is more that willing to go out of and detail.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

, but one online review and several older posts limit certainty.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM1108 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1