AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Angela Ohland

CMST2 · CMST4 · CMST002 · CMST004 · N3227 · C4769 · N4168 · N2811 · C6249 · 53 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
94.12%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a , and low-stress communication course with fair effort required.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDeeply caringClear expectationsBeginner-friendly public speakingLight workloadSupportive feedback
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Angela Ohland as , and calming for speech anxiety.
  • Most students earn high grades when they follow directions and complete speeches, quizzes, and group work.
  • In-person reviews mention participation and group work more often, while online reviews emphasize flexibility and organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most students report A-level outcomes with , and , but speeches, quizzes, and participation still require steady effort.

Online evidence is easier and more flexible, while and a few hard-grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The public speaking content can feel scary, but students , and calming style make it manageable.

Online reviews emphasize relaxed speeches and organization, while and guidance through speeches.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, but in-person comments repeatedly say participation and class presence matter.

Online has clearer flexibility, while performance.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and unusually good at reducing public speaking anxiety.

Both formats are highly recommended, with online reviews highlighting accessibility and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Grades are usually high and , though a few in-person students describe her as a .

Format shift

Online reviews more often call grading easy or clear, while .

Workload

Light

82/100

Work is usually described as light or manageable, with speeches, quizzes, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly discussions and quizzes, while and participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and especially supportive for nervous speakers.

Format shift

Both formats show excellent teaching, with online students emphasizing organization and in-person students emphasizing comfort and encouragement.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment appears centered on speeches, group projects, quizzes, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and three speeches, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise her warmth and feedback, but participation, group projects, and .

Main concern

A few students call her a .

What students said

“The work is very light, and prof Ohland creates a very welcoming environment for those who are scared to speak in front of the class.”
CMST2
“Participation in class matters, so .”
CMST4
“Angela is a cool person but a .”
CMST4

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students describe a very organized, caring class with , and strong access to help.

Main concern

Students still need to keep up with , and speech preparation.

What students said

“Class is not mandatory, but you do have to watch the lecture video.”
CMST2
“Took this course online and she couldn't have made it easier.”
N3227
“Speeches online are only in a group of 4-5 so it's very relaxed.”
CMST2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but quizzes and speeches appear manageable and sometimes student-friendly.

Weekly QuizzesThree SpeechesSome Open-Note QuizzesGroup Presentations

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and presentations, with one review saying quizzes are sometimes open note or with a group.

QuizzesGroup ProjectsSometimes Open-Note QuizzesPresentations
“There are quizzes and and you'll be good to go!”
C4769
“ open note or with your group”
C4769
“The group work takes a lot of effort but she'll help your group along the way.”
CMST4

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, lecture videos, discussions, and three speeches, but do not clearly .

Weekly QuizzesThree SpeechesLecture Videos
“Weekly discussions and a .”
CMST2
“There are 3 speeches.”
CMST2
“We had 3 speeches throughout which went by so fast.”
CMST2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Yes! Yes! Yes! if you can. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She walks you through everything very throughly and effectively.”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“Yes! Yes! Yes! if you can. .”

⚖️

82/100

“Do the work, get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and cares a lot about you doing well.
  • and super kind.
  • She lays everything out in front of you and walks you through it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The work is very light, and prof Ohland creates a very welcoming environment for those who are scared to speak in front of the class.
  • She is an .
  • Angela is a cool person but a .

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • She is always there to help in any way she can.
  • She made me feel much more comfortable and confident with public speaking.
  • She really cares and makes an effort to accommodate you as an individual.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

53

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years are detailed, format-labeled, and strongly consistent in praise with only a few outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 546
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CMST214 reviews
CMST00212 reviews
CMST412 reviews
CMST0045 reviews
C47692 reviews
Show 4 more courses
N32272 reviews
C62491 review
N28111 review
N41681 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

37

A+ 8 · A 28 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values