AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Randall Fukumoto

MATH124 · MATH018 · MATH26 · MATH18 · N5810 · MATH108 · STATS · MATH12 · MATH012 · MATH20 · MTH18 · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
86.96%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take him if you want a and are willing to keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny and engagingClear math explanationsTest heavyAccessible and caringMostly fair grading
  • Students repeatedly say he makes math easier to understand and keeps class entertaining.
  • Getting an A is realistic with , and .
  • Online reviews are more mixed because of , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

An A is very achievable with , and test practice, but it is not effortless because .

, while online reviews warn more about test mismatch and deadline issues.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students say he makes math and statistics simple, but the material can still feel challenging without consistent practice.

In-person students more often say the course feels easy, while online students report more self-directed difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say skipping class hurts performance.

, while online reviews focus more on keeping up with posted work.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

Most students recommend him because , and good at making math less intimidating.

, while online recommendation is positive but more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

He is often described as fair and and test preparation, though a few students call grading tough.

Format shift

In-person comments mention and fair grading more often, while online comments .

Workload

Light

68/100

Most students describe homework as manageable, but some and sudden due dates.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds lighter and more predictable, while online workload is more inconsistent.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently praise his humor, clarity, examples, accessibility, and ability to make math understandable.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are overwhelmingly positive, while online reviews range from .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple reviews say tests are a large share of the grade, often around 70 percent, with as practice.

Format shift

, but online students complain more about tests not matching preparation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing clear explanations, humor, accessibility, and fair chances to succeed.

Main concern

, and some students dislike his inappropriate or dark humor.

What students said

“It is easy to get an A.”
MATH018
“He made statistics very simple and broke down everything to a T.”
MATH108
“ , but they are not cumulative and not difficult if you show up to class.”
MATH018

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students praising clear videos and feedback while , and .

Main concern

Online students may need to manage deadlines and .

What students said

“Makes math so simple and easy to understand, and even provides comic relief.”
MATH12
“He would add MANY assignments 2-3 days before the due date.”
MATH108
“Tests were 70% of the grade and didn't really correlate well with the homework.”
MATH012

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Test HeavyThree TestsFinal IncludedNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

manageable when students attend class and practice.

Test HeavyNon-Cumulative TestsReview Days
“ , but they are not cumulative and not difficult if you show up to class.”
MATH018
“Only 3 tests, including the .”
MATH18

Online

Online reviews mention heavily weighted tests and , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Tests 70 Percent Of GradeHomework-Test MismatchNo clear proctoring evidence
“Tests were 70% of the grade and didn't really correlate well with the homework.”
MATH012
“When I took tests, none of the study material or .”
MATH108

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The makes the class tolerable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and uses an online program that is easy to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

87/100

“ !”

⚖️

70/100

“ . It wasn't always easy for me, but if you work hard there's no surprises.”

📝

55/100

“There are three tests worth 70 percent of your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes statistics really easy to follow and understand.
  • His lectures are concise and effective, with a .
  • He is really great at explaining hard concepts in an easy way.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do the homework and study Easy A.
  • Do your HW but don't think about it as HW, think about it as practice for the exams.
  • , but they are not cumulative and not difficult if you show up to class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and did not overload his students with .
  • Never did I once feel like I was bothering him or being a burden.
  • He will really help you if you need it and is really creative in his lectures to get his students to understand the content.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years, with consistent themes and enough detail to compare online and in-person experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 511
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH2610 reviews
MATH1089 reviews
MATH1248 reviews
MATH0187 reviews
MATH0124 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH123 reviews
MATH183 reviews
STATS3 reviews
MATH201 review
MTH181 review
N58101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 5 · A 21 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

5

C 3 · C- 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1