AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Maggi Dorsett

NUTRITON · FN8 · N1312 · FN02 · FN08 · FN50 · NUTRNUTR · FN2 · FN002 · FNFN · FN008 · NUTRITION · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
73.91%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and keep up weekly, but be cautious with online sections because the experience is much more inconsistent.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and approachableHeavy weekly workClear grading when organizedSlow gradingBetter in person than online
  • Students often find the material easy, but the weekly Smartbook, quizzes, discussions, papers, and .
  • Positive reviews praise her kindness, clear expectations, study guides, , and willingness to help.
  • Negative reviews focus on , and exams that sometimes do not match the content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

High grades are common, but students repeatedly say the A depends on , and readings on time.

Online students describe more time pressure and organization problems, while in-person students more often mention , note sheets, and easy exams.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The nutrition content is usually described as basic or easy to understand, but FN50 and some online sections feel harder because of volume, pacing, and .

Online reviews split between easy content and tough course management, while subject manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, though some reviews say participation matters or that skipping class hurts performance.

Online evidence focuses , while in-person evidence suggests class participation and lectures can matter.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students recommend her when she is organized and accessible, but many warn against sections with .

In-person reviews are more consistently positive, while online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

, study guides, note sheets, and many reported A grades suggest grading can be forgiving when students complete the work.

Format shift

and exam aids, while online reviews show more deadline strictness and grade delays.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The course is often not conceptually hard, but weekly Smartbooks, quizzes, discussions, readings, papers, labs, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly modules and discussion posts, while , and projects.

Teaching experience

Average

63/100

Students praise her kindness and useful lectures, but repeated , and weak online communication lower the teaching score.

Format shift

In-person teaching is generally viewed more favorably, while online teaching and responsiveness.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to come from a mix of exams, , and participation work.

Format shift

Online sections rely heavily on weekly assignments, discussions, quizzes, and exams, while in-person sections mention , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but more favorable overall, with many students praising her lectures, kindness, , and study guides while still noting lots of work.

Main concern

The workload can be high, and some flagged in-person reviews complain , and .

What students said

“This class is an easy A and yet you can still learn a lot.”
FN2
“Very knowledgeable and experienced in Nutrition. Pleasant and kind.”
FN8
“There's a lot of assignments and homework, a nutrition project, 4 exams and a final.”
FN2

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with many students earning high grades but also reporting , and .

Main concern

Online sections can feel disorganized and and .

What students said

“Easy class as long as you turn everything in on time.”
FN002
“It's easy content, but if you want to learn.”
FN8
“The content she teaches and assigns does not correlate with Exams.”
FN50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies because some students report study guides, note sheets, and open-book exams, while others report timed tests with .

Study GuidesTimed QuizzesTimed ExamsOpen Book Or Notes In Some SectionsExam Alignment Concerns

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or open-note exams in some sections, and timed quizzes or exams, but the policy is not consistent across reviews.

Study GuidesNote Sheet AllowedOpen Book Or Notes In Some SectionsTimed QuizzesTimed Exams
“ and you are allowed a note sheet.”
FN8
“ , but don't expect to find the answers easily.”
FN50
“ and .”
FN2

Online

Online reviews , and some hard timed tests, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Weekly QuizzesMultiple ExamsStudy GuidesTimed Tests In Some ReviewsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The and 25 question weekly quizzes.”
FN002
“3 exams + final (study guide)”
FN008
“Even with a study guide her timed tests are hard to get a good grade on”
FN50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy class as long as you turn everything in on time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

63/100

“She really cares about her students.”

📈 Effort For Grades

72/100

“None of the work is hard but it takes time.”

⚠️ Online Risk

68/100

“The we went over.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Maggi is great! She really cares about her students.
  • Very knowledgeable and experienced in Nutrition. Pleasant and kind.
  • Her lectures are straight to the point.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • None of the work is hard but it takes time.
  • Every week there is a discussion post and a paper.
  • There's weekly quizzes, weekly activities, weekly projects, 3 weekly postings.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Grades

  • .
  • and .
  • Grades are never updated in a timely manner.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews over many years with detailed and recurring patterns about workload, grading speed, online structure, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 58
3 out of 58
2 out of 510
1 out of 58

Course coverage

FN217 reviews
FN5012 reviews
FN86 reviews
FN0025 reviews
FN022 reviews
Show 7 more courses
NUTRITION2 reviews
FN0081 review
FN081 review
FNFN1 review
N13121 review
NUTRITON1 review
NUTRNUTR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 7 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3