AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Curtis Peldo

PHIL06 · PHIL02 · PHILSECT · PHIL6 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a strong teacher and are willing to attend, read, and study for a challenging philosophy or logic course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear LecturerPassionateAttendance MattersHard But RewardingLecture Heavy
  • Students consistently describe Peldo as , and memorable.
  • Logic can be challenging, but students say , and .
  • because lectures, activities, quizzes, and participation drive performance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic for students who attend, read, and study, but logic reviews repeatedly warn that the course is not a low-effort grade.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

Intro philosophy sounds manageable, but logic is repeatedly described as , and study-heavy despite Peldo making concepts clearer.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as necessary for passing because lectures, activities, quizzes, and participation matter.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and useful.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and some , but quizzes and tests can be tough.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is steady rather than light, with reading, chapter quizzes, activities, studying, and exams mentioned often.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly praise his clarity, passion, humor, accessibility, and ability to make difficult subjects interesting.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment includes quizzes, a , and in-class activities.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with , and help with difficult material.

Main concern

Students need to attend class and keep up with reading, quizzes, and exams.

What students said

“He is engaging with the class, and .”
PHIL02
“Logic is one of the toughest classes I have had to date”
PHIL06
“You must go to class to pass and pay attention.”
PHIL6

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe a standard in-person assessment structure with quizzes, a midterm, a final, an essay, and participation, but .

Chapter QuizzesMidtermFinal ExamEssayParticipation

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final, an essay, and participation, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Chapter QuizzesMidtermFinal ExamEssayParticipation
“ , and a final”
PHIL6
“Grade is based on a 500 point scale 20% Final 20% midterm 29% essay 20% quizzes 20% attendence”
PHIL6
“ if you don't read or study.”
PHIL6

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Curtis was an excellent professor. This is a hard subject but he taught in such a way that made it fairly easy to grasp.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is engaging with the class, and .”

👍 Recommendation Strength

92/100

“ if .”

📚 Effort Required

62/100

“Read the chapters, dont miss class, study hard, and you will get back what you put into it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Peldo is a veteran of logic and teaches it in a clear and precise manner
  • He makes concepts easy to grasp.
  • He makes a hard class interesting and fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • A very difficult class, be ready to work for it.
  • It is still a hard class so you can't slack.
  • If you do it is a well deserved A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is always there for you and tries to make the class the most interesting he can.
  • He genuinely wants to help and teach his students.
  • His love and dedication to the discipline serves as an example to me always.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 28 reviews span many years and show consistent , and exams.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 59
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL617 reviews
PHIL067 reviews
PHIL023 reviews
PHILSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values