AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Susan Krug

FN002 · NFSC120 · FN2 · FN10 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
88.24%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if possible, because the , and grade-friendly.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaring and HelpfulEasy AStudy Guides Match ExamsLecture HeavyBusy Work
  • Most students describe Susan Krug as kind, supportive, and clear.
  • Grades are usually very attainable if , and use study guides.
  • online review, which complains about busy work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Getting an A is very realistic if , and use her study guides.

, while the single online review says it is still easy if assignments are kept up.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The material is usually simple and clearly explained, though a few students mention fast pacing or heavy detail.

In-person comments mostly call the course easy, while the online review focuses more on workload than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance is often tied to success through notes, quizzes, and class guidance, but .

In-person evidence says showing up helps a lot, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend her because , and makes strong grades very achievable.

In-person reviews are highly enthusiastic, while the single .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

89/100

Grading appears generous because students mention , and easy A outcomes.

Format shift

, while the online review only supports an easy A through assignment completion.

Workload

Moderate

68/100

The workload is usually manageable, but students , and some busy work.

Format shift

In-person workload is mostly described as easy to manage, while the online review specifically says the work felt like busy work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently describe her as caring, helpful, knowledgeable, and .

Format shift

, while the online review gives little praise for the online learning experience.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and discussions rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

, and homework, while the online review emphasizes discussions and a nutrition essay.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

expectations, study guides, and an easy path to strong grades.

Main concern

Some lectures can feel monotone or lecture-heavy.

What students said

“This was an easy A.”
FN2
“Show up to class for an easy A!”
FN002
“She is very nice and and gives you PLENTY of time to complete it.”
FN10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review says the class is an easy A but feels loaded with busy work.

Main concern

Online work can feel repetitive and low-value.

What students said

“It felt like a lot of busy work online.”
FN002
“Easy A if you keep up with assignments.”
FN002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mostly student-friendly because study guides match tests, one page of notes is allowed in one review, and .

Study GuidesOne Page Notes AllowedRetakes PossibleFrequent Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention study guides, tests, quizzes, one page of notes, and , but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Study GuidesOne Page Notes AllowedRetakes PossibleQuizzes
“She lets you have a whole page of notes for tests and there were only 2 the whole semester.”
FN2
“make sure to use her study guides for the exams. everything is based off those!”
FN002
“She wants you to succeed and and tests if you talk to her in advance”
FN2

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the Browser use, or final format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was cake. I took her Wednesday evening class and passed with flying colors.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is such a sweet lady and a wonderful professor.”

📈 Easy A Pattern

92/100

“This was an easy A.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

88/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very nice and and gives you PLENTY of time to complete it.
  • Very passionate about the topic and does a great job of explaining it in a way that's easy to understand.
  • The lectures are monotone.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Show up to class for an easy A!
  • As long as you do the .
  • I only studied 1 hour before each test and got an A .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload and Assessments

  • It felt like a lot of busy work online.
  • There are quite a few quizzes and a BIG project, but she gives you the layout so if you stick to it then you won't have a problem.
  • She gives study guides and sticks to them.

Theme 4

❤️ About Support and Character

  • Susan is a true gem.
  • This is a professor who really cares about her students and the subject she is teaching.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 26 reviews span many years and show a consistent pattern, though online evidence is limited to one review.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FN213 reviews
FN0028 reviews
FN104 reviews
NFSC1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values