AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ripandeep Aulakh

M3962 · MATH11 · MATH018 · MATH18 · MATH108 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
84.21%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and can keep up with homework and test preparation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleClear math explanationsTest-heavy gradingLots of homeworkExtra credit available
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her patience, clarity, and willingness to help outside class.
  • The course is usually manageable, but and .
  • and ease, while online reviews show more exam risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic with , and , but it is not a free grade because exams matter heavily.

In-person reviews make the A path look easier through , while online .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The math content is often simplified well for struggling students, though statistics and .

, but in-person reviews more often call the class very easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as formally mandatory, but several students say missing class makes success harder.

Online evidence focuses on weekly work and lectures, while hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

Most students recommend her because , and and test load.

Both formats are mostly positive, but online reviews include the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

and , but test-heavy grading can still punish weak exam performance.

Format shift

, while online reviews more often stress that tests decide the grade.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

and sometimes heavy, even when students say it helps them learn.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention weekly homework, and a ton of homework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students consistently describe her as , and willing to give one-on-one help.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades appear driven mainly by tests, with , and occasional supporting performance.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly say tests make up most of the grade, while as important.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students usually describe her as , and easier than expected, with often helping grades.

Main concern

Attendance and because .

What students said

“ and and you'll be fine.”
MATH018
“Very easy. Almost too easy.”
MATH18
“ .”
M3962

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and helpful, but several warned that homework and .

Main concern

is strong.

What students said

“There are MOUNDS of .”
MATH11
“5 tests overall, including the final, and lots of homework but that's expected.”
MATH11
“You might get good grades in all the and still fail because of exams.”
MATH11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly show a , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or strict proctoring.

Test HeavyFinal IncludedReview Worksheet Extra CreditNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe important and and , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Test HeavyChallenging TestsReview Worksheet Extra Credit
“The and pretty difficult.”
MATH018
“She does a review day before the test and gives a review worksheet that can be turned in for .”
MATH018

Online

Online reviews mention multiple tests including a final and , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring rules.

Five Tests Including FinalTests Majority GradeNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“5 tests overall, including the final, and lots of homework but that's expected.”
MATH11
“ so make sure to do good on those.”
MATH018

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . I was so intimidated of taking statistics, but she's somehow managed to turn an extremely difficult subject and simplified it into something that any student can understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“She wants the class to understand the material, and will work with you one-on-one if you need more help.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

87/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“There are MOUNDS of .”

⚖️

68/100

“U can miss hw and do all of them for 90% credit and do just fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very good at teaching.
  • Her lectures were very easy to understand and the .
  • She makes a ton of sense while teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy. Almost too easy.
  • STATS is hard, just do the work and ask her for help if needed.
  • The , but the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She cares about her students and I learned so much from her.
  • She offers a lot of help outside of class and she is easy to reach.
  • If you need help, you can always ask her for it!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 19 reviews span many years, include both formats, and consistently describe the same strengths and workload risks.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH0189 reviews
MATH115 reviews
MATH1082 reviews
MATH182 reviews
M39621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 5 · A 3

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

4

C+ 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values