AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Moua Xiong

MATH124 · MATH11 · MATH13 · MATH5822 · MATH18 · MATH108 · MATH20 · MATH217 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you , and learning through repeated practice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardThick accentLecture heavyLots of homeworkCaring but inconsistentMixed grading
  • Students repeatedly say the accent and quiet delivery make lectures .
  • Grades can be fair or lenient if students attend, practice, and complete the work.
  • Experiences are highly mixed, with some students praising his care and others saying they could not learn from him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible with attendance, homework, and study guides, but many , and confusing lectures.

The Easy A evidence is mostly from in-person reviews, while the and a C+.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is manageable for some students, but lecture clarity, accent, and pacing often make it feel harder.

In-person reviews provide nearly all course difficulty evidence, while the lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance is often effectively required because in class.

, while the lone online review says he is considerate when students miss lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

accent, attend consistently, and learn through practice.

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, and the only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

because some students report tough grading while others , and points for trying.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is almost entirely in-person, while the online review tags him as a .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

and repeated practice assignments after class.

Format shift

Both the online review and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is often described as caring and detailed, but many students say his accent, quiet voice, and lecture style make learning difficult.

Format shift

, while the online review is negative about support and lecture usefulness.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to come from homework, quizzes, in-class assignments, tests, and .

Format shift

In-person evidence mentions tests, quizzes, group assignments, homework, and , while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and complaints about accent, lecture pace, homework, and weak explanations.

Main concern

Students often struggle to understand lectures and must attend consistently to keep up.

What students said

“Did not teach or ”
MATH18
“Easy A if you show up and pay attention.”
MATH108
“Show up to class, ask questions, and do the hw.”
108

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The one online review describes slow replies, helpful Pearson examples, lots of homework, and some flexibility about attending lectures.

Main concern

Limited instructor availability and weak lecture support.

What students said

“responds at least 2-3 days after you email him”
MATH11
“The examples on the .”
MATH11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest a mostly standard exam setup with some student-friendly aids like cheat sheets, notes, and partial credit.

Cheat Sheet AllowedOne-Side Notes AllowedQuizzesTestsPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quizzes, tests, and partial credit, but not a clearly strict proctoring policy.

Cheat Sheet AllowedOne-Side Notes AllowedIn-Class QuizzesPartial Credit
“He allows a cheat sheet for the .”
math13
“he lets you use one side of ”
MATH108
“He ”
MATH108

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book policy, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up to class, ask questions, and do the hw.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ .”

📉 Lecture Clarity

45/100

“He is extremely hard to understand because he has a very thick accent.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

55/100

“Easy A if you show up and pay attention.”

📚 Workload

35/100

“SO .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes step by step on how to solve a problem.
  • Did not teach or
  • He lectures for an hour straight and hardly ever has time for students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • He is a but wants you to pass.
  • if it is wrong.
  • If you do the study guide you will get an A on the exams.

Theme 3

📚 About Work And Attendance

  • there is a LOT of homework
  • You need to be there each day because there's either a .
  • Show up, do the , and you'll do fine.

Theme 4

❤️ About Support

  • and wants you to pass if you put in the effort.
  • He cares about his students, and .
  • He is not always availabe for his students during the times that you need help with homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 21 reviews across many years with detailed and consistent , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1088 reviews
MATH1244 reviews
1082 reviews
MATH182 reviews
MATH111 review
Show 4 more courses
math131 review
MATH201 review
MATH2171 review
MATH58221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values