AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Kimberly Clain

CDF014 · CDF48 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you mainly want an easy grade and can tolerate limited instruction and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy APoor TeachingUnpreparedAssignment HeavyStrict Late Work
  • Students often say the class is easy, but several describe weak teaching and poor guidance.
  • The online review is especially negative about communication, late work, and .
  • and one very positive experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

The course seems easy to pass with a high grade, but , and .

, but online students describe stricter rules and weaker guidance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The content appears intellectually easy, but poor instruction and itself.

Online evidence emphasizes poor guidance, while an easy A.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and deadlines appear strict overall because and another says .

Online evidence points to no late-work flexibility, while and extra time for valid reasons.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

because they describe poor teaching, weak preparation, and poor communication.

The online review is strongly negative, while but mostly critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades appear lenient because students earned high grades and one explicitly calls it an easy A, despite strict late-work complaints.

Format shift

, while the online review combines an A+ with strict policies.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not hard conceptually, but students , and random assignments.

Format shift

Online evidence lists several assignment types, while and random assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Teaching quality is poor overall because several students say she does not teach, is unprepared, or gives little guidance.

Format shift

The online review is sharply negative, while and positive teaching experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

The class appears assignment-focused because , and reading rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point toward assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

about preparation and instruction and one positive review about help and flexibility.

Main concern

Teaching quality and class structure are inconsistent.

What students said

“I am all alone with a bunch of other students, just doing random assignments.”
CDF48
“EASY A, though.”
CDF-014

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says the class is easy but poorly taught, with little guidance and no late-work flexibility.

Main concern

The main concern is low teaching quality and strict late-work policy.

What students said

“She doesn't actually teach anything”
CDF-014
“Doesn't accept late work”
CDF-014

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an final format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format, proctoring policy, open-book rule, midterm, or .

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy but low quality.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She doesn't actually teach anything”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“What a joke.”

📈 Easy Grade

88/100

“EASY A, though.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't actually teach anything
  • She is NEVER prepared for class, and always shows up late.
  • She was an amazing teacher, she helped with

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Guidance

  • I am all alone with a bunch of other students, just doing random assignments.
  • Students read the full chapters 1-12 with occasional reviews.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews give useful detail and a , but the sample is small and includes one strong outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CDF-0143 reviews
CDF481 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values