AI Rate Professor

Communication

Crystal Hilton

CMST60 · CMST2 · CMST4 · CMST54 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a structured public speaking course and can keep up with deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGood Public Speaking CoachCritical GraderHelpfulPop QuizzesNo Textbook Cost
  • and praise her personality, structure, and public speaking instruction.
  • The single online review is and little empathy for family issues.
  • Grades may be attainable, but students should expect participation, presentations, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is achievable, especially for strong public speakers, but , and critical grading require steady effort.

, while the online review warns that missing deadlines can hurt.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is accessible for students comfortable with speaking, but presentations, group work, and participation add pressure.

In-person reviews make the course sound manageable but active, while the online review gives less evidence about content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

because one review says students must show up to do well and the .

In-person evidence says showing up matters, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and personality, but the online review lowers confidence.

, while the only online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

but not lenient because students mention and strict deadlines.

Format shift

, while the online review emphasizes no extensions.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

The workload is moderate because the course involves presentations, papers, group work, pop quizzes, and participation.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe active class demands, while the online review mentions participation and group projects.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Teaching is strong overall because most students describe her as helpful, structured, funny, and effective in person.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is strong, but the online review reports low value and poor empathy.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Assessment appears balanced across speeches, papers, participation, group work, and .

Format shift

, and pop quizzes, while online assessment details are limited to participation and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and describe her as , and good for public speaking growth.

Main concern

Students should be comfortable speaking, attending, and .

What students said

“A very good class to improve your public speaking skills.”
CMST2
“she doesn't go easy on you.”
CMST2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative and says the class has no textbook cost but no grace for family issues.

Main concern

The main concern is strict deadline flexibility in the online class.

What students said

“ books”
CMST2
“There is this class”
CMST2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove exam .

Pop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but does not clearly prove any midterm, final, open-book rule, or proctoring policy.

Pop Quizzes
“ , so beware.”
CMST60

Online

The online review does not clearly prove quiz format, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A very good class to improve your public speaking skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She runs a very good curriculum and gives everyone the opportunity to do well.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“I think she's fantastic!”

⚖️

55/100

“She grades speeches kinda critical”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is an awesome teacher.
  • and has a good personality.
  • She makes you think outside the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy if you are good with public speaking.
  • , so beware.
  • You must show up in order to do well.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • I don't believe you get much useful information from this class.
  • There is this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews provide useful detail, but many are old and only one online review reflects the current online experience.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CMST24 reviews
CMST42 reviews
CMST541 review
CMST601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values