AI Rate Professor

Kinesiology

William Thomas

KIN27 · KIN57 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

if you want an easy activity credit and can handle a direct coaching style, but if yelling would ruin the class for you.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery EasyParticipation-BasedCaring CoachPolarizing TemperHelpful Feedback
  • Most positive reviews describe an easy, participation-based fitness course with supportive coaching.
  • A small cluster of in-person reviews reports yelling and poor teaching, creating real risk for students sensitive to coaching style.
  • Grades look very easy when students show up, participate, and complete the basic work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Getting an A appears very easy if students show up, participate, and complete simple workouts or activity tasks.

Online evidence directly calls the class easy, while and participation.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The course content is basic activity and fitness work, though some students say the .

The online review describes light workout tasks, while academic difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Attendance and participation appear central to success, even if .

and participation, while the online review describes completing workout work independently.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and easy, but several strong warnings about yelling lower confidence.

The online review is clearly positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

because multiple students report A+ grades and very low difficulty with participation-based expectations.

Format shift

Online and , but most grade evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

86/100

Workload appears light, centered on participation, workouts, and short activity-based .

Format shift

The online review mentions about 20 minutes for a workout, while and participating.

Teaching experience

Good

69/100

Many students call him caring, funny, and helpful, but repeated yelling complaints make the teaching experience inconsistent.

Format shift

Online evidence is positive, while and serious complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

Reviews mention participation, workouts, and .

Format shift

Both formats point to activity or .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

helpful, fun coach and students warning about yelling and poor instruction.

Main concern

Some students report being yelled at or not taught clearly before being expected to perform.

What students said

“you just have to show up, be respectful, and he returns in kind”
KIN27
“would yell at students for ”
KIN-57
“He pushes you even if you think you can't go no more”
KIN27

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The only online review describes a very easy class with short workouts and .

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one online review.

What students said

“this was such an easy class”
KIN27
“actually spend like the 20 minutes it takes to do one of the workouts”
KIN27

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format, final format, midterm format, or closed-book policy.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring policy, webcam rule, Lockdown Browser use, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you just have to show up, be respectful, and he returns in kind”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and coaching style. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

69/100

“He is always willing to listen and if you need help he is right there to help you.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

64/100

“horrible at teaching, he's funny but unless you liked getting yelled at and have no interest in .”

📈 Easy Grade

92/100

“this was such an easy class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Coaching Style

  • and respectful, and he returns in kind.
  • .
  • would yell at students for

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this was such an easy class.
  • actually spend like the 20 minutes it takes to do one of the workouts
  • If you put in the work, you will see results!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • i have no idea how this joker got hired, blew up at another student
  • had to withdraw second week because this guys teaching style is laughable
  • You'll love him!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across many years give useful signal, but the evidence is polarized and includes a same-day cluster of severe complaints.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

KIN276 reviews
KIN-573 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1