AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Elizabeth Dunn

ACCT30 · M1896 · ACCT2 · ACCT4 · M7829 · ACCT04 · ACCT202 · BUS20 · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want strong support and are ready to work hard, especially in person.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleHeavy workloadTough testsAccounting expertiseBest in person
  • Most students describe Dunn as caring, knowledgeable, and willing to help outside class.
  • The class is consistently demanding, with , and required practice.
  • Online reviews are more mixed than in-person reviews, especially around self-teaching and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A high grade is realistic for , and ask for help, but it is not a low-effort A.

Both formats show effort is required, while online reviews describe more self-teaching and time management.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Accounting concepts, hard practice problems, and frequent assessments make the course intellectually challenging even with support.

, while online students more often say the material is harder to follow.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Attendance and participation appear important because reviews mention in-class problems, quizzes, and that skipping class hurts performance.

, while online evidence focuses more on weekly deadlines and proctored exams.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because , and helpful, but some strongly dislike the workload and structure.

, while online reviews are more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grading is mixed, with and clear criteria in some reviews but many complaints about tough grading and .

Format shift

Both formats mention tough grading, while and support.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and significant study time.

Format shift

Online reviews quantify the workload as several hours per week, while and frequent class tasks.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most reviews describe her as caring, knowledgeable, and helpful, though some .

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised more strongly, while online teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades , and exams rather than only one assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, quizzes, discussions, and proctored exams, while , and major exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students more often praise her care, real-world examples, and help, while still calling the class rigorous.

Main concern

The main risk is that , and if students are not active participants.

What students said

“I took it in .”
ACCT04
“The class itself is definitely not easy and does require quite a bit of time to be spent practicing and studying.”
ACCT04
“She makes you work for the grade but she helps!”
ACCT04

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often praise her support and organization, but several say the format requires self-teaching and heavy weekly work.

Main concern

Online students may need to learn independently and manage a demanding workload.

What students said

“If you enjoy self teaching and .”
ACCT04
“Very challenging class online. Highly suggest setting aside 2 hours a day for study and review.”
ACCT04
“Work is time consuming so be prepared to spend around 7 hours/week and 3 proctored exams total.”
ACCT04

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, proctored online exams, and frequent quizzes, while reviews do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

In-Person Exams For Online ClassProctored ExamsHard TestsFrequent Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsFrequent QuizzesMultiple Exams
“ and .”
ACCT04
“ and 4 exams.”
ACCT04
“You have to show up every class, because there is a .”
ACCT30

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention in-person exams for an online class, difficult tests, and proctored exams, but do not clearly .

In-Person Exams For Online ClassProctored ExamsDifficult Tests
“Extremely unreasonable teacher, in person exams for online class and the work is just thrown at you rather than being taught the material.”
ACCT04
“Work is time consuming so be prepared to spend around 7 hours/week and 3 proctored exams total.”
ACCT04
“The , but you are given plenty of resources to prepare.”
ACCT04

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She makes you work for the grade but she helps!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Elizabeth was honestly one of the at Butte College!”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“There is lots of homework and you actually have to work for your grade.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

78/100

“Take her class if you want to learn, effort is certainly required but it's not overwhelming.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really helps you understand the material and .
  • She explained things sooo much better than other professors and really cared that her students do well.
  • Absolutely horrible and unstructured lecture style.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • You definitely have to work for it!
  • and .
  • Compared to other accounting teachers, she is an .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Care

  • Beth is the .
  • She constantly goes above and beyond to help her students, and genuinely cares about our success.
  • She checked in on me from time to time and even allowed me to take a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years, with consistent detail about teaching style, workload, grades, and formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 510
3 out of 56
2 out of 58
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ACCT0429 reviews
ACCT410 reviews
ACCT24 reviews
ACCT303 reviews
ACCT2021 review
Show 3 more courses
BUS201 review
M18961 review
M78291 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 8 · A 14 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 4 · B 7

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values