AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer White

TWOENG · ENG4 · ENGL10 · ENGL47 · ENGL2 · M3249 · ENGL4 · ENGENG · ENG11 · ENGL11 · ENG2 · ENGL6 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if and can keep up with reading and papers, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and approachableEngaging lecturesExtra credit availableReading and papersDisorganized online
  • In-person students often praise her as caring, funny, and discussion-focused.
  • Grades are often achievable with effort, , and completed writing, but late work and .
  • Online reviews , and uneven workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very reachable for students who show up, complete the writing, and use , but online confusion and .

, while online reviews show A grades can still happen but with more stress and uncertainty.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The material is not usually described as conceptually hard, but regular reading, papers, and .

In-person students often call the work reasonable, while online students describe workload swings and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students say showing up matters because and class information can be limited.

In-person reviews make attendance sound important for staying informed, while online reviews focus more .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and engaging lectures, but negative reviews cite politics, disorganization, and online teaching problems.

, while online recommendation is weak and cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Many students report fair or lenient grading, , and effort-based success, though some mention unclear grading, no late work, or few major assignments.

Format shift

as lenient, while as riskier because few quizzes or essays can heavily affect the grade.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload usually centers on reading and essay schedules in some sections.

Format shift

In-person workload is mixed but often manageable, while online workload is described as uneven and sometimes heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students frequently describe her as caring, funny, passionate, and engaging, but a minority find her political, unfocused, or unclear.

Format shift

In-person teaching is much stronger, while online teaching and little visible presence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear to , and occasional finals or quizzes rather than frequent exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, with online reviews noting a weight.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing engaging lectures, care for students, , and manageable grades with steady participation.

Main concern

Some students , and reading or paper workload.

What students said

“Show up to class, do the work and its an easy A.”
ENG2
“The work was not very difficult, just have to keep up with !”
ENG4

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections were described as , and stressful despite some students still earning A grades.

Main concern

Students had to interpret long announcements and .

What students said

“ and often not posted on time, making it stressful.”
ENGL11
“Have never seen her face, terrible at online teaching.”
ENGL11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly prove strict proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Occasional Final TestFinal Quiz25 Question FinalEasy Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention a 25 question final and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

25 Question FinalEasy Final
“We also had a 25 question final.”
ENG2
“The and made for people to pass.”
ENG11

Online

Online reviews mention a , but they do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Final TestFinal Quiz
“ and then springs a " .”
ENGL10
“At the end of it I had a B overall after the and .”
ENG11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up to class, do the work and its an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She is passionate about what she teaches and makes the class engaging.”

📈 Grade Value

78/100

“If you want an easy A, .”

⚖️ Workload Balance

48/100

“We got assigned a 2-3 page essay PER WEEK and we had to read a book at the same time.”

💻 Online Risk

40/100

“Have never seen her face, terrible at online teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Jen is great. She is very thought provoking and assigns only a couple papers.
  • Her lectures are extremely interesting and .
  • She is passionate about what she teaches and makes the class engaging.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Show up to class, do the work and its an easy A.
  • She gives out so much its crazy.
  • You can get A's on everything, but

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • and often not posted on time, making it stressful.
  • She .
  • , and I get marked down for seemingly no reason.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 42 reviews span many years, include detailed comments, and show a and weaker online experiences.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1111 reviews
ENGL118 reviews
ENG26 reviews
ENG46 reviews
ENGL103 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGL22 reviews
ENGENG1 review
ENGL41 review
ENGL471 review
ENGL61 review
M32491 review
TWOENG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 2 · A 16

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1