AI Rate Professor

Art

Cameron Kelly

COS126 · ART001 · M5581 · 2015FA · ART1 · ART8 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a , but be ready to read, participate, and manage occasional confusion.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and approachableInteresting art experiencesUseful feedbackSometimes confusingGenerally fair grading
  • Most students describe Kelly as kind, supportive, and engaging.
  • Grades are usually fair or easy, but an A .
  • Some reviews mention confusing teaching, difficult tests, or weak safety enforcement.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

73/100

Passing can be easy and , but several comments say earning an A , and serious project effort.

Online evidence is positive but thin, while and workload evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The course often feels approachable, but , and occasional keep it from being effortless.

The online-labeled review describes engaging learning, while and test difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention participation, galleries, museums, and class involvement, but they do not clearly prove a .

Online , while in-person reviews suggest participation and outside visits matter.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

, and engaging art experiences despite some concerns about clarity and safety.

The single online-labeled review is highly enthusiastic, while but include sharper criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Students describe easy or , though one strong review says an A is not automatic.

Format shift

, while the online-labeled review only reports an A and positive experience.

Workload

Light

66/100

Work usually sounds manageable, with , and essays rather than overwhelming volume.

Format shift

Online evidence does not describe workload in detail, while and project-based effort.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Kelly is often described as caring, interactive, and feedback-oriented, but a .

Format shift

The online-labeled review is strongly positive, while but more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment , and some tests rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

, and tests, while the online-labeled review does not clearly describe assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about feedback, kindness, and fair grading, with , and safety practices.

Main concern

Some students found the .

What students said

“lectures were very informative and interactive.”
ART1
“It's not easy to get an A.”
ART8
“Tests were very difficult for me, but .”
ART001

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online-labeled review is very positive and , and museum-based class experiences.

Main concern

There is only one online-labeled review, so format-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“Professor Cameron Kelly was a fantastic teacher to have.”
COS126
“She made her lectures interesting and lets us voice our opinions on the artwork.”
COS126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but and reading-based while allowing online completion.

Difficult TestsOnline Test OptionReading-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and allowed online completion.

Difficult TestsOnline Test OptionReading-Based Exams
“Tests were very difficult for me, but .”
ART001
“She expects you to read and she provides the textbook online.”
ART001

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and supports each student's artistic needs.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“lectures were very informative and interactive.”

⚖️

70/100

“She also graded fairly.”

📈 Effort for Grades

73/100

“It's not easy to get an A.”

👍 Recommendation Level

82/100

“ and a wonderful teacher to have!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made her lectures interesting and lets us voice our opinions on the artwork.
  • Sometimes as someone else stated, it is a little --but if you read and talking about.
  • kelly is a great artists, but not as a teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and grades pretty easily
  • It's not easy to get an A.
  • But her class is a easy pass.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Feedback

  • and supports each student's artistic needs.
  • She is a and will definitely work with you.
  • She was always upbeat and positive and encouraged you to try different things.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several years give useful patterns, but some are old and course contexts vary.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART83 reviews
ART12 reviews
2015FA1 review
ART0011 review
COS1261 review
Show 1 more courses
M55811 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values