AI Rate Professor

Multimedia Studies

Daniel Donnelly

PHOTO30 · MSP1 · MULTIMEDIA · MSP35 · MSP12 · ART23 · ART12 · MSP75 · ART34 · 2DANIMATION · M2951 · ART3136E · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

if you want a relaxed, supportive multimedia class with creative freedom, but expect .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient mentorFlexible projectsIndustry insightRelaxed deadlinesAmbiguous grading
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as patient, knowledgeable, helpful, and inspiring.
  • The class is usually easy if students attend, participate, and complete creative work.
  • The , and some concern about his support for AI in art.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Students repeatedly say the class is easy if you attend, try, and keep up with projects.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The course content is generally beginner-friendly, relaxed, and and project work.

All course-easiness evidence is from in-person classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

and passing, but the tone is more practical than punitive.

and participation expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend him for patience, experience, creative freedom, and .

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Grades and comments suggest leniency if work is completed, though criteria and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

84/100

Students describe relaxed deadlines, in-class work time, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students praise his patience, field experience, helpfulness, and ability to support different learning styles.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessment, and they focus on projects and completed work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews consistently describe a relaxed, helpful, project-based instructor who gives students time and creative freedom.

Main concern

Grading can be vague, delayed, or .

What students said

“Just very laidback and chill atmosphere.”
ART23
“ but .”
MSP1
“Easy A if you at least try”
ART12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy or testing format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ !”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“Easy A if you at least try”

⚖️

74/100

“ but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a very kind teacher
  • If !
  • Daniel knows his stuff and .
  • He is the

Theme 2

🎨

  • He is very relaxed with deadlines and due dates for projects
  • .
  • Great creative freedom
  • If you attend class and keep up with the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • .
  • He also didn't grade anything until the end of the semester.
  • This professor supports using AI.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across many years provide a detailed and mostly consistent picture, though some older comments reduce freshness.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART233 reviews
MSP123 reviews
MULTIMEDIA3 reviews
ART3136E2 reviews
MSP12 reviews
Show 7 more courses
2DANIMATION1 review
ART121 review
ART341 review
M29511 review
MSP351 review
MSP751 review
PHOTO301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1