AI Rate Professor

English

Lisa Kekaha

ENGL002 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you want a caring English professor, but do not miss class in the .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringClear gradingDetailed feedbackEasy classStrict participation
  • Students consistently describe her as caring and invested in their success.
  • Online reviews praise fast responses and .
  • The in-person review says the class is very easy but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class sounds easy overall, but the if attendance or participation slips.

Online evidence is positive but vague on grading effort, while the participation.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Students describe the class as easy and .

Online reviews emphasize supportive teaching, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but the in-person review says attendance is mandatory and grade-sensitive.

The only explicit attendance evidence comes from the in-person review, where missing one class can significantly lower the grade.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

All because , and clear.

Both online and in-person reviews are positive, though the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

and feedback help students, but daily participation can sharply affect the in-person grade.

Format shift

, while the in-person review warns that attendance strongly affects grades.

Workload

Light

82/100

The course is described as easy, and no review reports a .

Format shift

Online workload is not described in detail, while the .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently describe her as , and .

Format shift

Online reviews and responsiveness, while the but less detailed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and daily participation, with .

Format shift

Online evidence centers on assignments, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The in-person class is described as very easy but strict about daily participation.

Main concern

Missing even one class can significantly hurt the grade.

What students said

“Easiest class I have this semester hands down.”
ENGL002
“ if you miss literally one ”
ENGL002

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students , and quick communication.

Main concern

Reviews do not clearly describe workload or .

What students said

“Never had a teacher care about their students' success so much.”
ENGL002
“ and .”
ENGL002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or requirements.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Never had a teacher care about their students' success so much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“Wonderful teacher.”

⚖️

65/100

“ if you miss literally one ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Never had a teacher care about their students' success so much.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easiest class I have this semester hands down.
  • as she grades based on daily participation

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are consistent and include both online and in-person evidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL0023 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values