AI Rate Professor

Economics

Agne Reizgeviciute

ECON4 · ECON25 · ECON101 · ECON004 · M6934 · ECON002 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can, because the and homework much more than passive online independence.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear and caring lecturerAttendance mattersFair gradingStrong in-person teachingOnline platform issues
  • In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive and .
  • Online reviews are much weaker because students disliked the third-party platform and self-teaching feel.
  • Grades are very achievable , and keep up with examples.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very reachable with attendance and , but it is not effortless because , and participation still matter.

and achievable A, while online evidence shows more confusion and heavier self-management.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The economics content can move fast, but and examples make it understandable for many beginners.

as clearer and more guided, while online reviews describe more self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance is not always described as formally required, but students repeatedly say .

, while online reviews focus more on platform organization.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Most students recommend her because , and fair, though the online format creates a real downside.

, while online reviews are much less enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grading appears fair to lenient because students mention , and .

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the strongest evidence of leniency, while online .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload is manageable for in-person students but can feel heavier online because of , and exams.

Format shift

In-person workload is often described as weekly and manageable, while online workload is more often criticized.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

as clear and caring, but online reviews pull the overall teaching score down.

Format shift

In-person teaching is consistently strong, while online teaching is criticized for weak connection and outsourced materials.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments , and exam preparation rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

, and exams, while online reviews emphasize quizzes, exams, and third-party homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews , and fair structure, while stressing that attendance is important.

Main concern

Missing class can make students fall behind quickly.

What students said

“Just do the assignments and you will be golden.”
ECON002
“Be sure to show up to class or youll be lost BUT she provides everything you need for !”
ECON25
“HW is not hard either.”
ECON002

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed to negative, with , and heavy quiz or exam load.

Main concern

Students may need to manage third-party platforms and learn independently.

What students said

“You practically teach yourself.”
ECON002
“This entirely replaces her use of Canvas, which makes keeping up with .”
ECON002
“There are lots of quizzes and exams so be prepared.”
M6934

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show standard quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, or strict proctoring policies.

Quizzes and ExamsSticky Note AllowedExam Prep QuestionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one sticky note allowance, but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Sticky Note AllowedExam Prep QuestionsPop QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“you can use a ”
ECON4
“ .”
ECON25
“Tests aren't as hard as I expected.”
ECON004

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and exams but do not clearly .

Quizzes and ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“There are lots of quizzes and exams so be prepared.”
M6934
“She requires you to buy an online course/ .”
ECON002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She cares about her students and her students success. She cares if you get the material and puts it into easy to understand concepts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“I finally understood the material and she has a way of explaining concepts to you that will make you understand.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

84/100

“ .”

⚖️

76/100

“she provides everything you need for exams Awesome!”

💻 Online Risk

45/100

“You practically teach yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very passionate about teaching students.
  • I found her to be very engaging and comical with a lot of her stories.
  • !!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Just do the assignments and you will be golden.
  • Felt like I got an easy A.
  • Put in the work and you should do great.

Theme 3

🧭 and Structure

  • Don't skip class unless you feel like losing points for attendence & being totally lost next class.
  • Attend EVERY class because you can get lost quick.
  • and takes only an hour.

Theme 4

💻 About Online Experience

  • It's hard to know what's due when .
  • This entirely replaces her use of Canvas, which makes keeping up with .
  • There are lots of quizzes and exams so be prepared.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 18 reviews span many years, include detailed course experiences, and show a and .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON256 reviews
ECON0025 reviews
ECON0043 reviews
ECON42 reviews
ECON1011 review
Show 1 more courses
M69341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 9 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1