AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Bernadette Tello

SOC014 · SOC2 · SOC30 · SOC20 · SOC4 · M4568 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a manageable sociology grade and can tolerate boring, lecture-heavy classes.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy A With Few AssignmentsDry Lecture StyleTest HeavyExtra Credit AvailableCaring But Polarizing
  • Many students say the class is easy to pass or get an A because there is , and sometimes cheat sheets.
  • The biggest complaint is that lectures are long, dry, one-sided, and .
  • some students call her caring and clear, while others strongly dislike her teaching style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A is usually manageable because , and simple quizzes or projects, though some tests and essays can be confusing or strict.

Online evidence points to reading-based quizzes and few graded items, while in-person evidence more strongly supports , and cheat sheets.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course content is usually described as easy or general-education level, but , and .

Online reviews describe relatively easy reading and quizzes, while but lecture-heavy and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and , but at least one review says many students missed class without punishment.

Online reviews , while in-person reviews mention attendance helping, being mandatory, or being loosely enforced.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

but are split because the lecture style is often boring and polarizing.

Online reviews are mixed but lean manageable, while in-person reviews and strong complaints about lecture quality.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

66/100

Grading often appears lenient because students mention , and easy A outcomes, despite some complaints about tough essays and .

Format shift

Online grading is described as few-item and Pearson-based, while , cheat sheets, and occasional strictness.

Workload

Light

76/100

Workload is generally light because many reviews mention no homework or , and a group project.

Format shift

Online workload centers on reading, quizzes, exams, and a project, while as and one group project.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is mixed because some students find her caring and clear, but many describe lectures as boring, dry, one-sided, or poorly engaging.

Format shift

Online comments include clearer and kinder impressions, while delivery.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment leans exam-heavy because , and a final, with fewer assignments or one group project.

Format shift

, and group project, but in-person reviews provide stronger evidence of .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews repeatedly call the course easy and low-workload, but many criticize the lectures as boring and dry.

Main concern

Students may struggle to stay engaged because lectures are often described as dry, long, and repetitive.

What students said

“easiest class I've ever taken in my life, just pay attention to her lectures and that's all you need.”
SOC2
“her lectures are so DRY.”
SOC014
“ and only a main group project that you have months to do.”
SOC2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe an easy class with , but one student disliked the professor personally.

Main concern

The online class may be graded by few items, so quizzes and .

What students said

“The class was relatively easy, most assignments are graded on Pearson so as long as you do the on the quizzes.”
SOC20
“There is and a , and group project.”
SOC20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

in-person reviews making them more student-friendly through study guides or cheat sheets.

Weekly QuizzesMidtermFinalGroup ProjectCheat Sheet Allowed In Some In-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, midterms, finals, study guides, and allowed cheat sheets, but .

QuizzesMidtermFinalStudy GuidesCheat Sheet Allowed
“Only 2 exams, Mid-term & Final, BUT you can make a "cheat sheet" a full page front and back to use on the test.”
SOC2
“ .”
SOC2
“Her tests and her notes.”
SOC4

Online

, and a group project, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, open-book rules, or Lockdown Browser.

Weekly QuizzesMidtermFinalGroup Project
“There is and a , and group project.”
SOC20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“easiest class I've ever taken in my life, just pay attention to her lectures and that's all you need.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is a nice person, but not good with her teaching style.”

📈 Easy Grade Potential

78/100

“If you don't get an A in this class its because you couldnt handle getting a 10 question quiz every few weeks.”

⚖️ Workload And Grading

76/100

“ and only a main group project that you have months to do.”

👍 Recommendation Level

52/100

“ but not the professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures are so DRY.
  • Her lectures are boring but if and read the chapters she assigns and stuff you'll do good.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Super easy class.
  • Easy A as long as , and group project.
  • She offers .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Workload

  • There is and a , and group project.
  • Like 5 quizzes, a midterm, and the final.
  • .

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • and seems caring from my interactions with her.
  • She is a really sweet teacher.
  • but you're graded by few things.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 20 reviews span many years, include both formats, and consistently , and dry lectures.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

SOC212 reviews
SOC0142 reviews
SOC202 reviews
SOC42 reviews
M45681 review
Show 1 more courses
SOC301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values