AI Rate Professor

Communication

D. McCabe

CMST4 · CMST2 · CMST2H · CMST14 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her if and , and uneven class structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderParticipation-heavyHelpful feedbackMixed claritySpeech support
  • Student experiences are sharply mixed, with some praising her support and others calling the class repetitive or unclear.
  • This is not an easy A because students repeatedly mention tough grading, required participation, and real preparation.
  • In-person reviews are more balanced, while the single online review and feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students can earn strong grades, but comments repeatedly say the , and real work.

In-person reviews strongly show hard work for the grade, while the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course is challenging because speeches, group work, readings, quizzes, and .

In-person reviews give most of the challenge evidence, while the online .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Participation is central, and one review directly warns that skipping class means students will not pass.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends and speech coaching and uneven clarity.

In-person reviews are split but include strong praise, while the online review is clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple reviews call her a , and one student says students get the grade they deserve.

Format shift

, while the online review complains about AI-based grading.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students describe readings, quizzes, speeches, group reliance, participation, and work that cannot be winged.

Format shift

In-person workload evidence is heavy and consistent, while the online review mentions fewer graded items but .

Teaching experience

Average

61/100

She can be encouraging and helpful, but students , and weak feedback online.

Format shift

but , while the online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Reviews , and exams, with tests and quizzes appearing often.

Format shift

, and participation, while the online review only says grading used few items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with praise for encouragement and feedback but , and required participation.

Main concern

Students need to prepare, participate, and , and tests.

What students said

“This is not an EASY A. You CANNOT wing this class.”
CMST4
“sure her class is tough but only because the type of class it is.”
CMST14
“She turns Public Speaking into a fun experience rather than an anxiety-ridden course like I expected it to be.”
CMST2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly negative and and .

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“ as 100%! AI despite my assurance that it was my own work.”
CMST14
“ and instead relied solely on an AI system for grading”
CMST14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and reading quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

True or False QuestionsReading QuizzesTests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

True or False QuestionsReading QuizzesTests Mentioned
“T or F questions for the exams”
CMST2H
“the tests and .”
CMST2

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or quiz structure.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is not an EASY A. You CANNOT wing this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

61/100

“ and greatly helps in improving speeches.”

👍 Recommendation Level

55/100

“I really respect her and . Amazing professor.”

⚖️

28/100

“She gives you the grade that you deserve.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Drags the time along with repetitive lectures.
  • and quizzes have unlimited attempts online.
  • and greatly helps in improving speeches.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This is not an EASY A. You CANNOT wing this class.
  • sure her class is tough but only because the type of class it is.
  • you do have to do the readings and work hard!

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • she really helped me get through the class.
  • and understanding and really wants you to succeed!
  • She's very laid back with a positive attitude and you can tell she enjoys her job.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years provide enough detail to show a consistent mixed pattern despite older dates.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CMST23 reviews
CMST142 reviews
CMST42 reviews
CMST2H1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2