AI Rate Professor

English

Molly Emmons

ENGLISH · ENGLI119 · ENGL60 · ENGL2M6880 · ENG002 · ENGL2 · ENGL011 · ENG6 · ENGL4 · ENGLISH60 · ENGLI2 · ENG119 · ENGLISH2 · ENG11 · ENG60 · ENG2 · ENGL6 · 89 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
60.53%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want structured writing support and can handle a demanding, personality-driven class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but PolarizingClear Grading CriteriaWriting HeavyStrong FeedbackSometimes Harsh
  • Many students , and willingness to help.
  • The class , and attention to instructions.
  • Student experience is polarized, with repeated complaints about rudeness, rigidity, or heavy workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

An A is very reachable through clear criteria, revisions, , and , but students still report steady writing and homework.

Online evidence is more mixed, while in-person .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The course content is usually manageable and clearly explained, but writing volume and strict expectations keep it from feeling effortless.

In-person students more often call the class easy, while online and struggle.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews repeatedly stress participation, listening, and showing up, but do not prove a .

Both formats emphasize participation, with performance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

and feedback, but the repeated harshness and workload complaints make her a risky fit.

In-person reviews are more favorable overall, while online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

and flexible through revisions, late-work acceptance, , and contract grading, despite some tough-grader complaints.

Format shift

In-person reviews show stronger evidence of revisions and , while online reviews are split between lenient and inconsistent.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and writing even when the work is manageable.

Format shift

Both formats report substantial work, with online students especially noting homework and navigation burden.

Teaching experience

Good

67/100

Many students describe her as , and helpful, but a significant minority describe her as rude, rigid, or discouraging.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is stronger and more positive, while online teaching evidence is more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment , and projects rather than exams.

Format shift

, and no tests, while online comments mainly mention homework, writing, and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

clarity, and care, but many warn about workload, lectures, and harsh moments.

Main concern

Her style can feel intense or rude to students who dislike heavy participation and direct criticism.

What students said

“There are , and 2-3 papers that she gives you opportunity to redo for a chance at a higher grade.”
ENG2
“This may be an elective, but it is pretty work intensive.”
ENGL6
“Literally yells at students.”
ENGLI119

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews and complaints about poor directions, slow help, and .

Main concern

Online students may feel unsupported if .

What students said

“She accepts late work, and .”
ENGL2
“Everything was a struggle with her online.”
ENG11
“Molly gives lots of homework but not all of it is required.”
ENGLI2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest evidence points to writing-based classes with , while online exam policy is not clearly proven.

No Tests In Some In-Person ClassesWriting-Based AssessmentFew Tests Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

sections and mostly describe papers, homework, and revisions.

No Tests In Some SectionsPapers And RevisionsFew Tests Mentioned
“There are , and 2-3 papers that she gives you opportunity to redo for a chance at a higher grade.”
ENG2
“ but very easy.”
ENG119
“A few tests, so the textbook only felt necessary during those times but this class really runs on creativity.”
ENG6

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She wants to see her student succeed and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

67/100

“Molly Emmons not only cares about your grade, she also cares about you.”

⚖️

74/100

“ cares about every student, the assignments are typically fun and pretty easy to do.”

📝 Workload Reality

38/100

“This may be an elective, but it is pretty work intensive.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

65/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a very clear grading criteria and by the end of the course if you get enough points, the rest of the .
  • She gives excellent and , and .
  • and helpful. Classes are not boring and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Super easy class to pass.
  • Molly gives lots of homework but not all of it is required.
  • Put in the work and you get an A, put in most work a B, etc.
  • There was a ton of homework but hey, its college isnt it?

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Concerns

  • She is God awful.
  • She is VERY rude to the students and makes you feel stupid for .
  • I didn't learn anything I couldn't have googled and she made me miserable.
  • She spends a lot of time lecturing, late often .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

89

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years and courses, with detailed and consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542
4 out of 516
3 out of 511
2 out of 55
1 out of 515

Course coverage

ENG210 reviews
ENG117 reviews
ENG1197 reviews
ENG64 reviews
ENGL23 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ENGL63 reviews
ENG0022 reviews
ENG602 reviews
ENGLISH22 reviews
3411 review
38011 review
ENGL0111 review
ENGL2M68801 review
ENGL41 review
ENGL601 review
ENGLI1191 review
ENGLI21 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 10 · A 9 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1