AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sanjay Dev

MATH124 · MATH4AND5 · MATH110 · MATH5 · MATH26 · MATH18 · MATH05 · M124118 · MATH4 · MATH108 · MATH005 · MATH12418 · C5812 · STATISTICS · 150 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
92.59%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Sanjay Dev if you want a manageable and rewards consistent effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExceptionally caringClear math explanationsBeginner friendlyFlexible deadlinesHighly recommended
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Sanjay Dev as , and unusually effective for math-anxious learners.
  • , and exams that often mirror assignments, but students still need steady homework effort.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because Pearson-based courses can feel distant or homework-heavy, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A is realistic because , and assignment-aligned exams, but students still need to complete regular homework and quizzes.

and assignment-matched exams, while in-person evidence shows flexible support and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The math content can be challenging, but students say .

, while online reviews depend more on videos and Pearson materials.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

as strictly mandatory, but several students imply showing up matters for passing and understanding the work.

In-person students stress attendance and engagement more, while online reviews and deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students recommend him because , and especially helpful for people who struggle with math.

Both formats are mostly recommended, but online has a few complaints about distance and workload while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

, and clear test expectations rather than by removing all effort.

Format shift

and forgiving due dates, while in-person reviews emphasize extensions and help with passing.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The and quizzes, with some online students calling it heavy.

Format shift

Online work is more Pearson-heavy and sometimes criticized as too much, while as manageable with attendance.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and unusually effective at teaching math.

Format shift

In-person reviews are near-unanimously excellent, while online reviews remain strong but include a few concerns about distance and organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams rather than relying only on one category.

Format shift

Online reviews mention Pearson homework, quizzes, and exams, while , and review days.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

clarity, kindness, humor, and ability to help struggling math students succeed.

Main concern

Some classes are still challenging and .

What students said

“Sanjay is by far the .”
MATH18
“It was one of the hardest class I took.”
MATH12418
“Show up every day and !”
MATH124

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive, with , and , though a few students found Pearson-heavy work distant or disorganized.

Main concern

Pearson-based online work can feel heavy or disconnected from direct instruction.

What students said

“ than expected.”
MATH05
“Prof. Dev would assign so .”
MATH4
“If you communicate with him, he and exams you did poorly on in order to revise.”
STATISTICS

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams sound student-friendly because students mention , and tests matching assignments, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Assignment-Aligned ExamsRetake OpportunitiesExtensions PossibleReview DaysClear Test Expectations

Assessment risk

Standard

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and makeups, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules or closed-book requirements.

Review Days Before ExamsClear Test ExpectationsMakeup Tests Possible
“ ”
MATH18
“he always told us exactly ”
MATH12418
“he let me make up the test and quiz”
MATH05

Online

Online reviews mention Pearson quizzes and , and exams matching assignments, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Pearson Quizzes And ExamsRetake OpportunitiesExtensions PossibleAssignment-Aligned Exams
“he and exams you did poorly on in order to revise”
STATISTICS
“ than expected.”
MATH05
“Everything was done on Pearson”
MATH4

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Sanjay is by far the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Sanjay is hands down the entire career as a student!”

👍 Recommendation Strength

95/100

“ and !!”

⚖️

84/100

“If you communicate with him, he and exams you did poorly on in order to revise.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes learning and so easy
  • Material is presented in such a !
  • He finds the easiest possible way to help his students solve problems

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • You have to put in some effort, but it's easy compared to others.
  • than expected.
  • It was one of the hardest class I took.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • He cares about the success of his students and is so willing to help you when you need it.
  • and .
  • and wants you to do well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

150

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, repeat the same themes, and include detailed comments across online and in-person formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5140
4 out of 57
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1249 reviews
MATH48 reviews
MATH187 reviews
MATH55 reviews
MATH054 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH1083 reviews
MATH124183 reviews
MATH262 reviews
MATH4AND52 reviews
STATISTICS2 reviews
1241 review
C58121 review
M1241181 review
MATH0051 review
MATH1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 5 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values