AI Rate Professor

Communication

Amy Oelrichs

U5060 · CMST2 · CMST3237 · CMST002 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and can handle strict grading details.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExpectationsStrong Speech FeedbackTough GraderPublic Speaking ConfidenceOnline Course Friction
  • , and supportive public speaking environment.
  • students calling it tough or nitpicky.
  • The course is manageable when students prepare speeches carefully and follow details.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

A grades are possible, but and details matter.

, while the one in-person review reports an easier path with limited speech meetings.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The public speaking content is understandable, but speeches, formality, and preparation add real pressure.

Online reviews are mixed on course setup, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Speech meetings, participation, and live speaking components appear required, though one student received scheduling help.

Online reviews mention participation and live speeches, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and feedback, but grading complaints create real hesitation.

Online recommendations are polarized, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Many students call her a tough grader, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide nearly all grading evidence, while the .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and preparation, but it is not described as impossible.

Format shift

Online reviews mention daily modules and lots of homework, while the .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often describe her as , and helpful, but several report poor feedback and .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is polarized, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears centered on speeches, modules, discussions, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions modules, quizzes, and , while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The and describes an easy-to-follow course with flexibility around speech scheduling.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“Oelrichs course is easy to follow with only three required speech meetings.”
CMST002

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed but lean positive when students prepare, follow criteria, and .

Main concern

Strict or .

What students said

“Put in the work, and pay attention to the details and you will get graded well.”
CMST002
“The .”
CMST2
“She is encouraging and .”
CMST2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support quizzes and speech-based assessments, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

QuizzesLive Zoom Final SpeechesRequired Speeches

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review mentions required speech meetings, but it does .

Required Speech Meetings
“only three required speech meetings”
CMST002

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

QuizzesLive Zoom Final SpeechesRecorded Lectures
“we had a module due every single day with a .”
CMST002
“when we did our live zoom final speeches (we had 3) she gave amazing feedback to improve!”
CMST002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Put in the work, and pay attention to the details and you will get graded well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She is encouraging and .”

⚖️

30/100

“The .”

👍 Recommendation Level

70/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are short and she is entertaining.
  • She is encouraging and .
  • and concise with her expectations.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She grades very hard with .
  • It was a tough B to get, I took her at Shasta and she was by far the hardest teacher.
  • Put in the work, and pay attention to the details and you will get graded well.

Theme 3

💬 About Online Course Setup

  • The course arrangement is a mess compared to other online classes
  • She had the very easy to navigate the course.
  • Her class is set up incredibly inconveniently for those of you who are employed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen detailed reviews across several years give strong signal, though the evidence is heavily online.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CMST28 reviews
CMST0025 reviews
CMST32371 review
U50601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1