AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Tiffani Anderson

CHEM11 · CHEM110 · N6694 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
82.35%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Take her if you will attend, practice regularly, and ask for help early, but if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentClear examplesTest heavyExtra credit availableAttendance matters
  • Online reviews are strongly positive, especially for , and open-book testing.
  • In-person reviews are split between strong praise for and severe complaints about pace, attitude, and .
  • Getting a good grade is realistic, but , and consistent study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

A grades are common with , and , but students do not describe it as low-effort.

Online evidence is more grade-friendly, while , and difficult tests.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

Chemistry is repeatedly described as hard, but and structured notes can make it manageable.

Online students say she makes hard material easier, while and fast confusing lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because reviews mention participation, in-class work, and getting lost after missing class.

The ; online reviews still expect watching lectures and completing work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most recent and online comments recommend her, but older in-person reviews include strong warnings about pace, attitude, and test preparation.

Online recommendations are consistently strong, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, and grade-scale help balance out tough tests and some strict grading complaints.

Format shift

Online grading looks more lenient, while to tough and confusing.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention , and practice problems, so the workload is steady but not universally overwhelming.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lecture videos and assignments, while , and suggested homework.

Teaching experience

Average

61/100

She receives strong praise for and examples, but many in-person students report fast pacing, mistakes, and unhelpful responses to questions.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is excellent, while and more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and some homework rather than only exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests and submitted lab or lecture work, while , and major tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person feedback is highly mixed, with many students praising examples and while others , and rude responses to questions.

Main concern

Students who struggle with chemistry may feel lost if the pace or communication style does not fit them.

What students said

“She breaks abstract concepts and math problems down into easy to understand steps.”
CHEM110
“ and difficult.”
CHEM110
“Be prepared to teach yourself.”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe her as , and grade-supportive despite chemistry being hard.

Main concern

The work still requires steady lecture watching, notes, and assignments.

What students said

“ ”
CHEM-11
“ ”
CHEM110
“Tiffani made it very easy to learn and set us up to succeed.”
CHEM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies because online tests were open book, while and difficult cumulative or test-heavy sections.

Open Book TestsOpen Book QuizzesNo Final In One SectionDifficult Cumulative FinalTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open-book quizzes and , but other sections had difficult cumulative or .

Open Book QuizzesNo Final In One SectionDifficult Cumulative FinalTest Heavy
“ and written portion and are open book.”
CHEM-11
“ .”
CHEM-11
“ and pretty difficult.”
CHEM110

Online

, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Open Book Tests
“ ”
CHEM110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Chemistry can be very challenging but she went above and beyond to make sure everyone understood.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

61/100

“She breaks abstract concepts and math problems down into easy to understand steps.”

👍 Recommendation Signal

70/100

“ .”

⚖️ Grade Effort

60/100

“If you do this, and attend class, and study you will get AT LEAST a B.”

🧪

55/100

“ and difficult.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She starts hard concepts with a simple version, then builds on it until it is real chem.
  • Goes way too quickly over material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Chem is not easy but her way of relating examples to real-life things is genius!
  • Lots of EC opportunities.
  • The but she gave lots of opportunity for .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Communication

  • She really cares about her students and wants them to succeed.
  • Very kind :)
  • Communication was a bit of a struggle, so after lab.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Be prepared to teach yourself.
  • She gets defensive when students ask questions for clarification.
  • The and confusing and the and very very confusing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 26 reviews span many years, include both formats, and provide detailed recurring patterns despite polarized opinions.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM11022 reviews
CHEM-112 reviews
11621 review
N66941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1