AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Erin Boyle

ANTH002 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want an engaging anthropology class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate TeacherTest HeavyTough GraderFascinating Lectures
  • Students strongly like Boyle's teaching and passion for anthropology.
  • The course is heavily test-based, with several midterms and a .
  • Grades are hard to raise because a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A looks difficult because grades depend heavily on tests that students found hard despite studying.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material sounds engaging and manageable, but the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Participation matters is listed, but the reviews do not clearly describe a .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Students praise Boyle personally, but the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grades appear strict because and few grading opportunities.

Format shift

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews available.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not described as huge, but .

Format shift

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews available.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe Boyle as passionate, nice, and engaging even while criticizing the .

Format shift

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews available.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

and a final quiz mentioned.

Format shift

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but repeatedly warn that the .

Main concern

study.

What students said

“Really fascinating class and I loved prof.”
anth002
“ and no matter how much I studied, I never got good grades on the tests.”
anth002

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews clearly describe frequent tests and a , but .

Multiple MidtermsFinal QuizTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not clearly prove exam rules such as open-book or proctoring.

Multiple MidtermsFinal QuizTest Heavy
“Instead of a and a final test at the end there was three or four "midterms" that all had the same grade importance and a final quiz covering everything.”
anth002
“ ”
anth002

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and no matter how much I studied, I never got good grades on the tests.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Really fascinating class and I loved prof.”

🧪 Test Pressure

45/100

“ and no matter how much I studied, I never got good grades on the tests.”

⚖️

25/100

“no matter how much I studied, I never got good grades on the tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really fascinating class and I loved prof.
  • Erin is a teaches

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • no matter how much I studied, I never got good grades on the tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, detailed, and consistent about teaching quality and testing.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

anth0022 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values