AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Lisa Westwood

ANTH16 · ANTH112 · ARCHAEOLOGY · ANTH2 · ANTH4 · ANTH13 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and can keep up with regular reading and written work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and responsiveClear organizationReading-heavyLenient gradingStrong anthropology passion
  • Students usually describe Westwood as , and .
  • Grades are generally reachable, but , and .
  • Online evidence is more mixed because some students found the setup boring, impersonal, or overloaded with emails.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

An A is very reachable because grading is often forgiving and appears, but students still , and handle quizzes or papers.

Online reviews show more workload friction, while in person-coded reviews more often call the course extremely easy or open-note.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course content is usually approachable, but , and .

Online comments mention boring or , while in person-coded comments are more likely to describe the class as easy and interesting.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation and steady weekly work matter in some sections.

and discussion work, while in person-coded evidence gives little direct attendance information.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and supportive.

Both formats are mostly positive, but online reviews include a few stronger complaints about pacing, setup, and test alignment.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students mention easy grading, , late work acceptance, and open-note tests, though .

Format shift

Online reviews show and late work flexibility, while in person-coded reviews include stronger easy-course and open-note evidence.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is steady because students , and papers.

Format shift

Online reviews more often call out lots of homework and reading, while in person-coded reviews range .

Teaching experience

Excellent

87/100

Students repeatedly describe her as , and knowledgeable, despite a few negative outliers.

Format shift

Both formats support strong teaching, with online reviews adding more detail about emails, videos, and response speed.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Assessment appears to mix quizzes, tests, worksheets, discussion posts, papers, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize textbook work, quizzes, worksheets, and discussion posts, while in and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person-coded reviews are mostly positive and often describe her as helpful, enthusiastic, and easy when students follow the course structure.

Main concern

The , and .

What students said

“Laid back and willing to help.”
ANTH13
“Easy and I learned a ton.”
ANTH112
“Watch out for the 15 page paper”
ANTH16

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise clear organization, fast communication, and manageable assignments, but .

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“The professor checks in with emails and videos, and .”
ANTH16
“Theres a lot of homework, but she also gave us an opportunity that raised my grade like 8%.”
ANTH13
“Be prepared for a lot of reading.”
ANTH13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed because some reviews mention open-book or book-ready tests while .

Open Book EvidenceBook-Based TestsQuizzesFinal PaperPolicy Not Fully Clear

Assessment risk

Varies

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person-coded reviews explicitly mention open-book or open-note tests in some sections, but they do not prove a .

Open Book TestsOpen Note TestsStudy Required
“the .”
ANTH13
“ and everything is completely open note”
ANTH13
“ .”
ANTH16

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and ready helps, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or a consistent open-book policy.

Weekly QuizzesBook-Based TestsPolicy Not Fully Clear
“ to look things up.”
ANTH13
“The one and it shot my grade- BUT she does offer !”
ANTH16

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super helpful, and wants her students to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

87/100

“Lisa makes her online class very clearly outlined, so you can stay on track and up to date.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

86/100

“i would 100% take this course again.”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“Be prepared for a lot of reading.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She knows a lot about the content, and challenges you to question your world view.
  • Great teacher, and intelligent lady.
  • Excellent teacher, very enthusiastic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The course work is easy and she is an .
  • Theres a lot of homework, but she also gave us an opportunity that raised my grade like 8%.
  • , but study for quizzes.

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • She sends lots of emails, grades things quickly, and .
  • Don't be afraid to contact her if you need help!
  • Every time i emailed her, she wrote back within a day.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 27 reviews span many years, include detailed comments, and show consistent themes despite some older and mixed entries.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH1312 reviews
ANTH168 reviews
ANTH43 reviews
89341 review
ANTH1121 review
Show 2 more courses
ANTH21 review
ARCHAEOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values