AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Judith Rohrer

DRFTSECT · DRAFTSECT · DRFT12N · DRAFT12 · DFT12 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedOften LateHeavy HomeworkTough GraderHelpful One-on-One
  • , and poor availability.
  • A few older positive and knows the material.
  • Workload and as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears costly because reviews mention lots of , and unclear directions with no easy-A evidence.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content sounds manageable, but and disorganization make it feel harder than the material itself.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person drafting reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews discuss the instructor being late, but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews mention class timing, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Students mostly advise avoiding her because of , and tough workload.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The a C grade and complaints about unclear directions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

One recent review directly reports a lot of homework, and the negative tone suggests poor workload payoff.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

, and unprepared teaching, though a few students found her helpful individually.

Format shift

In-person evidence is mixed but leans strongly negative, and there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

and drafting class work, while .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated , and limited help outside class.

Main concern

because lectures and .

What students said

“ .”
DFT12
“Consistently late for class. Not a good teacher.”
DRAFTSECT
“She is , she is all over the place with her lectures.”
DRAFT12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final structure.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is , she is all over the place with her lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom reliability. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She is , she is all over the place with her lectures.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

22/100

“Skip if you can.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • have an idea or general trajectory for her lecture.
  • She is , she is all over the place with her lectures.
  • Unprepared for class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Directions and clarification are given after the fact.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • Very helpful. .
  • She has alot of knowledge about the material and will always help with any little question.
  • she makes up for it when she comes around and talks to you individually.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are 12 consistent reviews, but many are old and .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

DFT126 reviews
DRAFTSECT3 reviews
DRAFT121 review
DRFT12N1 review
DRFTSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1