AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Adam Nako

ENGR3 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you and group work for a manageable grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnclear LecturesHarsh Field LabsEasy HomeworkHeavy Group Work
  • The only review is negative despite an A grade.
  • , but group work and .
  • Teaching clarity is a concern, with lectures described as unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A looks reachable because the , but group work and .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The academic work sounds manageable, but and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

The but does not clearly prove a .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The student clearly disliked the class because of , and difficult group work.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

The A grade and , but there is too little evidence to call it generous.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Homework is easy, but group work and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

The review and focuses more on frustration than learning.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The , and group work, with .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The but unclear lectures, difficult group work, and .

Main concern

Field labs and group work create most of the pain.

What students said

“Lectures weren't that clear, but at least the .”
ENGR3
“The group work in this class is a killer.”
ENGR3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format, proctoring, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, I just really didn't like this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Lectures weren't that clear, but at least the .”

📦 Workload Reality

28/100

“The group work in this class is a killer.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“Honestly, I just really didn't like this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures weren't that clear, but at least the .
  • Honestly, I just really didn't like this class.

Theme 2

💪 About Workload

  • Field labs in 100 degree heat are never fun.
  • The group work in this class is a killer.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so conclusions are useful but weak.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values