AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Lani Muelrath

KIN31 · PE1 · PE23A · TTAPP1493 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you , but do not expect consistently detailed guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful When ResponsiveVague InstructionsBusy-Schedule FriendlyModerate WorkloadMixed Communication
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with older students praising professionalism and .
  • The class can fit a busy schedule, but students still need to keep up with , and exercise work.
  • Communication quality is inconsistent across reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Students can do well by completing discussions, videos, quizzes, and participation tasks, but .

Online evidence shows both easy completion for organized students and frustration with vague directions; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The PE and kinesiology content appears manageable, but the structure and .

Online reviews emphasize assignment clarity issues, while and general helpfulness.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Reviews mention live meetings, video submissions, and participation options, so flexibility depends on the specific class setup.

Online reviews focus on participation tasks, while and video alternatives.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on whether students value independence and can tolerate inconsistent clarity and response time.

Online evidence is evenly split, while in-person-labeled reviews lean positive but include a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

and comments suggest fair outcomes for completed work, but there is not enough evidence of .

Format shift

Online reviews include two A grades, while .

Workload

Moderate

56/100

The workload includes , and added exercises, making it manageable but not effortless.

Format shift

Online workload centers on discussions, videos, and quizzes, while , and exercise tasks.

Teaching experience

Average

65/100

Students praise her professionalism and encouragement, but vague instructions and inconsistent responsiveness keep the experience mixed.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is split, while clarity complaint.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mainly mention , and participation rather than major exams.

Format shift

and participation than formal exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person-labeled reviews are mostly positive about professionalism and encouragement, but one reports weak schedule clarity and limited attentiveness.

Main concern

Responsiveness and schedule clarity may vary.

What students said

“She also obviously knows her stuff!”
PE1
“She is lazy about updating the class .”
PE23A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews split between a busy-schedule-friendly class and a .

Main concern

and require independent problem solving.

What students said

“Instructions for .”
KIN31
“amazing for students with a busy schedule that need an extra PE class.”
KIN31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and assignments, but they do not clearly prove exam format, webcam .

Quizzes MentionedVideo AssignmentsNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-labeled reviews do not clearly describe exams, midterms, finals, open-book rules, webcam rules, or proctoring policy.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and video assignments, but they do not clearly prove .

QuizzesVideo AssignmentsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“turning in video assignments and !”
KIN31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Instructions for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, communication, workload, and structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“She obviously cares about student success.”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

45/100

“She is lazy about updating the class .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

55/100

“amazing for students with a busy schedule that need an extra PE class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The instructor is the most professional of any of the teachers I've had at this college.
  • and encouraging.
  • The teacher is not very attentive to emails or students.

Theme 2

📋 About Workload & Structure

  • As long as you are participating in discussions, turning in video assignments and !
  • The workouts are 55 and added exercises.
  • Instructions for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

54/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 6 reviews are available, they span a long time, and opinions conflict.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

KIN312 reviews
PE12 reviews
PE23A1 review
TTAPP14931 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values