AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Jennifer Charles-Tollerup

AGS20 · AB26 · AGS020 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her if you want to learn and , but if workload and organization matter most.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy HomeworkLong LabsMixed CommunicationApproachable HelpParticipation Driven
  • , and unclear Canvas organization.
  • In-person reviews and flipped classes that feel self-taught.
  • Grades can be good, but students , and participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Good grades are possible, but students , and participation as the real cost of earning them.

Online evidence points to more effort, while and steady study.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is learnable but , and sometimes poorly explained or flipped.

Online comments emphasize workload and , while and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but as important for grades.

Online reviews focus on assignments, while as essential.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend her when they value engagement and help, but others warn the workload, organization, or .

Online recommendation is mixed with heavier criticism, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades can be strong and one review mentions , but the workload and participation demands prevent this from feeling broadly lenient.

Format shift

Online grading has one positive extra-credit signal, while and knowing the material.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews describe long labs, lots of , and hours of weekly work.

Format shift

Online because of long labs and many videos.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often approachable and energetic, but several students report unclear instructions, poor communication, or self-teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching suffers from organization issues, while and confusing.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and participation more than exams.

Format shift

Online evidence is assignment-heavy, while , and some tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with praise for energy and approachability but complaints about flipped teaching and .

Main concern

Some students feel they must teach themselves or rely heavily on participation.

What students said

“She is high energy which helps stay engaged.”
AGS20
“Her class was flipped so the students taught the course.”
AB26

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report a , and mixed clarity despite one very positive review.

Main concern

Online workload and .

What students said

“Homework can take a couple hours (2-4) and .”
AGS20
“Labs are super long some up to 20 pages, lots of drawings, tons of videos (8+ per week 7-15 mins each) and readings.”
AGS020

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though .

Exam Policy UnclearThree Tests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews only clearly mention that one class had .

Three Tests Mentioned
“Three tests.”
AB26

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You learn a lot but ”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Jennifer is a great professor. She is high energy which helps stay engaged.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“Labs are super long some up to 20 pages, lots of drawings, tons of videos (8+ per week 7-15 mins each) and readings.”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

50/100

“You learn a lot but ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • Shes unaware that she has very poor communication and .
  • Her class was flipped so the students taught the course.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class is moderate difficulty and if you dont do the .
  • Be willing to spend 2+ hours a .
  • Participation during each class was essential for a good grade.

Theme 3

🧪 About Workload

  • Homework can take a couple hours (2-4) and .
  • Labs are super long some up to 20 pages, lots of drawings, tons of videos (8+ per week 7-15 mins each) and readings.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years give useful patterns, but opinions are mixed and some details are course-specific.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AGS204 reviews
AB262 reviews
AGS0202 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values