AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Eric Hererra

CHEM · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderVery difficultLow supportAvoid warning
  • The only review is extremely negative.
  • The student describes grading as nearly impossible.
  • The comment warns strongly against taking the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

The review says students fail and , so getting an A appears extremely unlikely.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The class is described as extremely difficult and discouraging, with no evidence that the content is made manageable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters is tagged, but the review does .

The only evidence is in person and does not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

The review directly warns students to stay away because of and poor support.

Recommendation evidence comes only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

3/100

The and classmates failed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The review does not detail assignments, but the class experience is described as extremely demanding and punishing.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and it gives limited workload detail.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

The student reports low care for students and a damaging classroom experience.

Format shift

Teaching and is entirely negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

The review focuses on grades and failure, but does not clearly describe the assessment mix.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The harsh grading and low student support.

Main concern

The main and poor student care.

What students said

“If you care about your gpa or your self esteem run for the hills.”
chem
“Grades impossibly.”
chem
“Stay away if you value your mental health and wellbeing because he doesn't care at all”
chem

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest strict grading risk, but do not .

Harsh gradingNo clear exam format evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove the exam format or proctoring policy.

Harsh gradingNo clear exam format evidence
“Grades impossibly.”
chem

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you care about your gpa or your self esteem run for the hills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

3/100

“Stay away if you value your mental health and wellbeing because he doesn't care at all”

⚖️

3/100

“Grades impossibly.”

🎯 Teaching Experience

8/100

“Eric doesn't care about his students.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Grades impossibly.
  • Ive failed and watched my classmates fail around me.

Theme 2

🚫 About Student Experience

  • If you care about your gpa or your self esteem run for the hills.
  • If you think you like science you won't in his class.
  • Stay away if you value your mental health and wellbeing because he doesn't care at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the signal is strong in tone but weak in sample size.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

chem1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1