AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rita Nutsch

MATH26 · MATH116 · M116 · G6253 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her if you can keep up, participate, and self-correct, but if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed teaching qualityParticipation heavyExam heavyHelpful but strictOnline varies
  • Online reviews are more positive overall, but still mixed.
  • and condescending behavior.
  • Grades are possible, but exams and participation create real pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A grades appear possible, but students must understand the , and keep up with homework.

Online reviews show more A outcomes and clearer structure, while , and participation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is manageable for some students but becomes .

Online students more often describe the structure as clear, while and harder exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation is repeatedly emphasized, and one online tag says skipping class will hurt performance.

Both formats emphasize participation, with and public work.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students are split because she can be helpful and organized, but .

Online evidence is more favorable overall, while and uneven.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and late passes help, but and several students call her a tough grader.

Format shift

and , while online reviews show mixed grades and some tough-grader concerns.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and online systems create steady work rather than a light class.

Format shift

and tests every other week, while online reviews describe clearer but still structured assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Some students praise her help and clarity, but , and a condescending tone.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are more positive on organization, while and classroom tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Tests and exams dominate the grade, with homework and participation supporting but .

Format shift

In-person reviews explicitly say tests are worth 70% and occur often, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with helpfulness and offset by , and tone.

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and public participation pressure.

What students said

“This professor cares about her students greatly and , but the class was difficult.”
MATH26
“Constantly wants student participation instead of just teaching.”
MATH116
“Teaches in the and makes numerous mistakes in math everyday”
M116

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mixed but lean more positive, with and quick help.

Main concern

and unfair treatment.

What students said

“Rita was AMAZING. Lectures were straight forward.”
G6253
“Lectures, canvas and and organized.”
MATH116
“She teaches in the ”
MATH116

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , but reviews do not clearly prove open-book status, closed-book status, webcam use, or proctoring rules.

Tests worth 70%Six examsTests every other weekXYZ exams and homeworkNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove whether exams are closed-book or otherwise proctored.

Tests worth 70%Six examsTests every other week
“Tests were worth 70%, homework 20% and participation 10%.”
MATH26
“There are a total of 6 exams out of 100 points.”
MATH116
“ .”
MATH116

Online

Online reviews mention exams and , but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring policies.

XYZ exams and homeworkNo clear proctoring evidence
“the xyz website we use for exams and .”
MATH116

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor cares about her students greatly and , but the class was difficult.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“Some students say and helpful, while others say she teaches in .”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

55/100

“You can not pass this class by cheating on homework as you will not score a good grade if ”

⚖️

84/100

“Tests were worth 70%, homework 20% and participation 10%.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Rita was AMAZING. Lectures were straight forward.
  • She is a good math teacher; if you have any questions, she is more than happy to answer them before or after class.
  • Teaches in the and makes numerous mistakes in math everyday

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This professor cares about her students greatly and , but the class was difficult.
  • There are a total of 6 exams out of 100 points.
  • .

Theme 3

🗣️ About Classroom Fit

  • unless you are a confident person.
  • Constantly wants student participation instead of just teaching.
  • She really worked with me while I was having life issues

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed, consistent themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1167 reviews
G62532 reviews
M1162 reviews
MATH261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1