AI Rate Professor

Multimedia Studies

Erin Wade

ILLUSTRATION1 · ART31 · MSP10 · ART10 · PHO18 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Take Erin Wade if you want a and can attend consistently, but if you need strong lectures and deep instruction.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy ProjectsAttendance HeavyClear InstructionsMixed Teaching QualityBeginner Software Help
  • The class is usually easy to pass or earn a high grade if students attend and .
  • Student opinions on teaching are and and video-heavy.
  • , and several students say missing class can hurt the grade even when the work is done.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A appears very achievable because , and appears, but attendance and keeping up still matter.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content is mostly beginner software work and simple projects, though some students.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, which consistently describe low intellectual difficulty but mixed instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as important, and students say missing class can seriously hurt the grade or cause problems.

All attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

but hesitate because teaching quality and clarity vary widely.

All , and opinions are strongly split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Several reviews say the class is easy, everyone can get an A, or she is an , though one review says she grades hard.

Format shift

online grading evidence available.

Workload

Light

68/100

Work mainly consists of projects and a few quizzes, and students generally describe the class as easy if they keep up.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online workload evidence available.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students praise her clarity and help, while others say she relies on videos, teaches poorly, or .

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, and the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

, and class participation rather than exams or written assignments.

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online assessment evidence available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

attendance expectations and inconsistent teaching quality.

Main concern

The main concern is that some students felt the class relied on videos, unclear explanations, or .

What students said

“It's an easy pass if you keep up with projects.”
ART31
“It doesn't matter how good of an editor you are, everyone gets an A.”
MSP10
“All .”
MSP10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe projects, with one review mentioning few quizzes and no writing assignments, while .

Project-Based AssessmentFew QuizzesNo Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a few quizzes, but they do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, midterm, or .

ProjectsFew QuizzesNo Clear Exam Policy
“This course consisted of , and .”
ART31
“We did several editing projects, 1 film/edit project.”
MSP10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's an easy pass if you keep up with projects.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“YouTube is a better teacher than her.”

📈 Grade Value

82/100

“It doesn't matter how good of an editor you are, everyone gets an A.”

⚠️

15/100

“ dropped.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Erin is very clear on instructions and .
  • She makes the class very beginner-friendly, has great class projects and is always down to help her students succeed and understand the software one on one.
  • Showed us videos instead of teaching, taught us everything we already knew.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • It's an easy pass if you keep up with projects.
  • It doesn't matter how good of an editor you are, everyone gets an A.
  • .

Theme 3

🕒 and Class Structure

  • Just show up engage, and do the work.
  • dropped.
  • if you still get everything done.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 10 detailed in-person reviews across many years, with consistent , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART313 reviews
MSP103 reviews
ART102 reviews
ILLUSTRATION11 review
PHO181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1